The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2007, 04:25 PM   #16
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
This thread is a joke, and anybody who has their panties in a wad in here needs a reality check, with a two by four to the head. I know this is a hot-button issue for y'all, what with the looming specter of Hillary, gearing up her federal jackboots to disarm you so that your family can be murdered by crackheads that soft-on-crime Liberal judges have set free, etc.

...but seriously, folks. Can you read this part without laughing? Read it carefully. Slowly. Go ahead and read it a few times.

Quote:
...as recently as 15 or 20 years ago, there were 250,000 licensed gun dealers in the United States.

Today, the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives told WND, there are 108,381, and if more cases involving dealers such as Red's Trading Post of Twin Falls, Idaho, develop, that number will plummet quickly.
Wait, did the Bureau actually say that, or was that Chicken Little? I'm so confused, the hard-hitting journalism has bedazzled me with a barrage of fact-like things!

There...used to be...a bigger number... now it's smaller... and now this other thing... OMG! I just put 2 and 2 together and it's time to freak out!
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 08:33 PM   #17
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Ridicule all you want, there has been a concerted effort by the feds to control guns by paring the number of outlets to a minimum.

Perhaps because they are too lazy, or under resourced, to enforce the thousands of laws on the books, they have chosen to group the sources into fewer, more easily defendable, fortified, locations. This is because in case of "civil insurrection" or "national emergency", BATF assumes control and defense of all firearms sources.

This is the ultimate gun control and much easier to keep additional guns, and ammo, from flowing into the hands of the people, with only a few outlets to seize.

The problem for us is that fewer outlets reduces competition, increases prices, reduces selection and is generally bad business.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 08:41 PM   #18
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Anyone who does not believe the likes of scumbags Pelosi, Cliton, Schumer, and Feinstein are not after you guns you are a fucking idiot... Well unless of course you agree with their agenda. This little group is about to turn the tables upside down. Whine about freedom of speech on the right hand, whine about the loss of freedoms as we attempt to kill terrorists on the left, kick the 2nd Amendment to the curb. Cherry picking Demoncrats in the finest form. Be careful what you vote for, you just may get it.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 08:56 PM   #19
wolf
lobber of scimitars
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Cliton
Your Freudian Slip is showing.
__________________
wolf eht htiw og

"Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island

High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis
wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 09:02 PM   #20
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf View Post
Your Freudian Slip is showing.
Actually a purposeful slip I like to use. She is not much more than a "little man in one's boat" to me. Rub it if you need it. Otherwise ignore it... D:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 09:05 PM   #21
Ibby
erika
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
I think having every OTHER amendment in the bill of rights trampled is worse than having just the second trampled. Lesser of two evils and all that.
Maybe that's just me.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
Ibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 09:07 PM   #22
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Yes, that's just you.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 09:07 PM   #23
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Ibram, How many guns do you own? I mean personally and all under the law...
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 10:30 PM   #24
Ibby
erika
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
I am totally against gun control, though I don't own a gun, obviously.
But still, I think gun ownership is FAR from the most important right. Just about every other amendment is being used like toilet paper by this administration (I half expect them to start commandeering houses as barracks!)... but the second, of course, is untouched. I would MUCH prefer the opposite - though obviously, IDEALLY, then we could have BOTH gun rights and all other rights.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
Ibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2007, 12:59 AM   #25
redstradingpost
Neophyte-in-training
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 3
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
I don't care enough to dig for it myself, but I'm going to take anything Red's or its lawyers say with a grain of salt. They are the very definition of a biased party here.
Glatt, so do you think that were just making it up? Here are your stats: The number of dealers from 1994-2005 decreased nearly 80%. The number of revocations of licenses is up nearly 6 times from 2001-06. I welcome you to look it up for yourself, it is pretty disturbing. I wish the ATF would address it but they won't.

I would like to thank many of you for your comments and support, it really means alot!
Thanks,
Ryan Horsley
Red's Trading Post
redstradingpost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2007, 01:02 AM   #26
fargon
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 8,924
The time has come for direct intervention. If they have not been shut down yet, I would say that when the ATF assholes show up at their door they should call the local police, and have them arrested for trespassing.
P.S. 19Apr76 I swore to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, against all enemies foreign and domestic. So help me God!!!
__________________
Annoy the ones that ignore you!!!
I live a blessed life
I Love my Country, I Fear the Government!!!
Heavily medicated for the good of mankind.

Last edited by fargon; 06-28-2007 at 01:07 AM. Reason: PS
fargon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2007, 07:58 AM   #27
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by redstradingpost View Post
Glatt, so do you think that were just making it up?
It's cool that you came to this thread.

I don't question the overall statistics of overall gun shops closings out there. What I question is your specific case. There are three relatively minor violations listed on your website, and you and your lawyers claim in the media that you are being shut down over just those three minor violations.

Are they the only three, or are you cherrypicking examples from a much larger list that may contain more serious infractions? Can you post the complaint (or whatever the legal document is called) that the government filed against you? Something that might tell their side of the story in this case?

I'm glad you are fighting the fight against the government here if you truly believe that you are in the right. The courts can sort it out. That's what they are for.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2007, 08:30 AM   #28
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
Quote:
...as recently as 15 or 20 years ago, there were 250,000 licensed gun dealers in the United States. ...Today...there are 108,381...
Quote:
Originally Posted by redstradingpost
... Here are your stats: The number of dealers from 1994-2005 decreased nearly 80%. ...
Those numbers don't match up. Over "15 or 20 years" the number dropped about 57%, but in 11 of those years, the number dropped almost 80%? Did the number actually increase around 20% in the first 4 to 9 years of the "15 to 20 years" and then drop sharply? Can I see a graph?


Quote:
Originally Posted by redstradingpost
...so do you think that were just making it up?
Making WHAT up? Be specific.
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2007, 09:13 AM   #29
redstradingpost
Neophyte-in-training
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
Are they the only three, or are you cherrypicking examples from a much larger list that may contain more serious infractions? Can you post the complaint (or whatever the legal document is called) that the government filed against you? Something that might tell their side of the story in this case?
Glatt, Actually the 3 violations that they were being referred to were recent violations in the audit before last. The ATF has chosen to audit us several times since, the last audit which was last week produced 2 new violations:A customer not filling out the transfer date (he came in later and filled it in)A firearm that was logged in to our book was missing a digit in our acquisition book

The problem is that each time they come to audit us it generally costs us about $5,000. Here is the article from the last audit:
http://www.magicvalley.com/articles/...ate/114470.txt

Flint, here is the stats that I am referring to. This is also from an a Gun Control group that brags about the decrease in numbers of dealers:
http://www.vpc.org/press/0603dealers.htm

The reason that I am speaking up is not to draw more attention to my case because honestly we have become a bigger target but to make gun owners and the public aware of what is happening.
redstradingpost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2007, 09:30 AM   #30
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by redstradingpost View Post
Glatt, Actually the 3 violations that they were being referred to were recent violations in the audit before last. The ATF has chosen to audit us several times since, the last audit which was last week produced 2 new violations:A customer not filling out the transfer date (he came in later and filled it in)A firearm that was logged in to our book was missing a digit in our acquisition book

The problem is that each time they come to audit us it generally costs us about $5,000. Here is the article from the last audit:
http://www.magicvalley.com/articles/...ate/114470.txt
So as I understand it from the article, there were a handful of audits between 1980 and March 1997. As a result of those audits, the agency shut you down, but a judge stayed that action in March, so you can stay open until it works its way through the courts. The ATF is apparently pissed now and is coming back looking for more evidence against you and generally making your lives miserable. The question I have, is what did they find that made them want to shut you down in the first place? It sounds like all the nit-picking examples you list have all come since they tried to shut you down. What did they find before then? Is there a serious infraction you aren't mentioning? Or have they been nit-picking all along?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.