Undertoad Wednesday Sep 10 02:51 PM9/10/2003: DaVinci theft

If you have a digital camera, you have a duty to take shots of everything. You never know what will become interesting later.
What you're looking at is the theft of DaVinci's Madonna with the Yarnwinder from a castle in Britain.
The shot was taken by a tourist, who was visiting from New Zealand. But actually she wasn't just shooting at random; she shot because she thought it might be a robbery. And it was.
"We heard the alarm going off and the first man climbed over the wall and said not to worry, 'Don't worry love, We're the police. This is just a practice' he said. When the second man came over the wall we felt something was going on."
And it was, the theft of a painting worth anywhere from 25 to 100 million pounds ($40-145 M).
full story
But at least one person says it's not a DaVinci after all.
BryanD Wednesday Sep 10 03:40 PMthe REALLY wierd bit is - I was on the way to this castle (about 30 minutes out) when this occured..
We ran into police roadblocks on the B-road we were on as we got closer.
Elspode Wednesday Sep 10 04:05 PMPresumably, an enhancement of the pic will show the license plate...of course, I'd have to guess that the car was stolen as well.
Here's a link to a copy of the controversial artwork...
http://www.abcgallery.com/L/leonardo/leonardo29.html
Unknown_Poltroon Wednesday Sep 10 04:26 PMdigital images.
I didn't know you could really enhance digital images that much.
Elspode Wednesday Sep 10 04:34 PMOh, sure...they do it in spy movies all the time. You know the government keeps all the really good special effects...um...er...digital processing algorithms to themselves, don't you? 
xoxoxoBruce Wednesday Sep 10 06:33 PMThat is a very strange painting

elSicomoro Wednesday Sep 10 08:37 PMOh sure...they say it's fake AFTER the painting is stolen. That's pisspoor psychology.
I've never understood art theft...I mean, what the fuck are you going to do with it? You could sell it to an art fanatic and make over that way, but then what the fuck is the buyer going to do with it? How would you explain it to your friends when they come over?
Elspode Wednesday Sep 10 09:41 PMThat's the beauty of art. If you can afford it, you can buy it, lock it away in a little room...and then just look at it to your heart's content, and feel privleged.
Art is a very personal thing. Everyone reacts differently and individually to a work of art. I cannot honestly say that I've ever enjoyed viewing art more in a group than I have on my own.
Then again, the temptation to hang it in your living room and invite the entire PTA over would be strong. "That old thing? Oh, that's just a DaVinci I picked up the other day at the flea market."
Remember that part in "The Freshman", when Penelope Ann Miller tells Matthew Broderick that the Mona Lisa hanging over her mob daddy's (Marlon Brando) mantle is the real one, and the one in the Louvre is a cunning replacement?
xoxoxoBruce Wednesday Sep 10 10:00 PMAnd you can keep anyone else from looking at it if you wish.
mitheral Thursday Sep 11 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Elspode
Oh, sure...they do it in spy movies all the time. You know the government keeps all the really good special effects...um...er...digital processing algorithms to themselves, don't you?
|
They just have to whip out their copy of Photoshop NSA.
xoxoxoBruce Thursday Sep 11 07:12 PMThey took shuttle photos (and movie film) to the Kodak plant in NY state. They, did some amazing things.
elSicomoro Friday Sep 12 03:58 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Elspode
That's the beauty of art. If you can afford it, you can buy it, lock it away in a little room...and then just look at it to your heart's content, and feel privleged.
|
Oh, I understand that, Ep. I just personally find it offensive--and sad.
russotto Friday Sep 12 02:03 PMThere's definitely enough information in that image to get at least a partial plate. Particularly given you know the font and the possibilities. My algorithm reveals
MS96 XBP
Though the M and the B are rather doubtful.
xoxoxoBruce Friday Sep 12 07:56 PMMS 96 X B P You mean Bill Gates is behind this too.
russotto Monday Sep 15 09:53 AMYep. He bought the manuscripts and now he's taking the art, any which way he can.
BryanD Tuesday Sep 16 11:05 AMactually, I expect it was the newpaper that blurred the plate. I remember the radio giving out the car registration number, along with the description of the vehicle.
Elspode Tuesday Sep 16 02:11 PMThat seems sort of silly...why would you blur the very information that might help solve the crime, especially when it had already been released over the radio?
wolf Tuesday Sep 16 02:21 PMMight be a "quality of image" issue rather than an "intentional obfuscation" issue.
Of course, if the museum had been attempting not to have it discovered that it had a fake ... curiouser and curiouser.
jaguar Tuesday Sep 16 10:50 PMThings like this are often stolen 'on order' as well, so there is high chance it was 'sold' per se before they even stole it.
Your reply here?
The Cellar Image of the Day is just a section of a larger web community: a bunch of interesting folks talking about everything. Add your two cents to IotD by joining the Cellar.
|