Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sarge
(Post 836493)
being in the military, i'm offended that these americans were not given the requested support. there was a uas circling overhead providing ongoing coverage of the battle to the situation room. hell, they even had a seal on the roof lasing targets and requesting spectre gunship support. denied. they were left to die
|
Being a critical thinker, I'm offended that the worst possible outcome is being endlessly repeated and worse, believed by those who've put their trust in Fox News. I have far greater trust in the White House, the CIA, and the Pentagon, all of whom have rejected the Fox News' conclusion you have repeated.
Quote:
Following a pair of denials by the CIA and the National Security Council to a Fox News story published Friday, the Pentagon has come under scrutiny for its response to the assault on the U.S. compound in Benghazi. However, in a statement to The Atlantic Wire, a senior defense official says the Pentagon never rejected requests for military intervention in Benghazi. Not only that, the official said no such requests were ever made.
|
Fox's record for getting the facts straight is poor, and most especially in situations that are republican red meat like this. Fox doesn't know what happened, no more than their ex-Seal expert knows what happened. Drawing conclusions like "they were left to die" is not responsible journalism, it's yellow journalism; it is pure sensationalism.
If you're interested in *what happened*, follow the investigations. Here is a good link for you to read. It includes a couple **hypothetical** situations that accommodates the statements of all parties.
Quote:
To Zaid, it's perfectly plausible that the vagueness of the Pentagon and CIA denials is a result of still not knowing the whole of what happened in Benghazi. "When the fog of war surrounds an event it is not at all unusual for individual agencies, such as the CIA or DoD, or the White House to limit their statements to the knowledge they possess at the time rather than something all-encompassing for the entire Executive Branch," he said. "Simply put, none of these entities likely fully know what the other did or did not know at the time."
|
But right now, we don't know all of what happened, and no one there could have known the whole situation either. To suggest otherwise is Monday morning quarterbacking at best, invidious character assassination at worst. Let's see what happened before we hang anyone for treason, hmmm?
|