The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2015, 12:06 PM   #1
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Pro vs Con

Pro vs Con website has a list of 16 peer reviewed studies supposedly showing liberals and conservatives physiologically different.
Quote:
In the 16 peer-reviewed scientific studies summarized below, researchers found that liberals and conservatives have different brain structures, different physiological responses to stimuli, and activate different neural mechanisms when confronted with similar situations. Each entry below cites the source document. The studies are arranged from most recent to oldest. We included all the peer-reviewed studies on this subject that we could find. If you know about others, please contact us with details.
The list titles are:
1. People right-of-center politically spend more time looking at unpleasant images, and people left-of-center politically spend more time looking at pleasant images.
2. Reliance on quick, efficient, and "low effort" thought processes yields conservative ideologies, while effortful and deliberate reasoning yields liberal ideologies.
3. People who react strongly to disgusting images, such as a picture of someone eating worms, are more likely to self-identify as conservative.
4. Liberals have more tolerance to uncertainty (bigger anterior cingulate cortex), and conservatives have more sensitivity to fear (bigger right amygdala).
5. Conservatives have stronger motivations than liberals to preserve purity and cleanliness.
6. Liberals are more likely than conservatives to shift their attention in the direction of another person's gaze.
7. Republicans are more likely than Democrats to interpret faces as threatening and expressing dominant emotions, while Democrats show greater emotional distress and lower life satisfaction.
8. Conservatives and liberals react similarly to positive incentives, but conservatives have greater sensitivity to negative stimuli.
9. Conservatives have more activity in their dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, the part of the brain that activates for complex social evaluations.
10. Conservatism is focused on preventing negative outcomes, while liberalism is focused on advancing positive outcomes.
11. Genetics influence political attitudes during early adulthood and beyond.
12. Conservatives learn better from negative stimuli than from positive stimuli and are more risk avoidant than liberals.
13. Individual political attitudes correlate with physiological traits, such as sensitivity to sudden noises and threatening visual images.
14. Liberals are more open-minded and creative whereas conservatives are more orderly and better organized.
15. When faced with a conflict, liberals are more likely than conservatives to alter their habitual response when cues indicate it is necessary.
16. Conservatives sleep more soundly and have more mundane dreams, while liberals sleep more restlessly and have a more bizarre, active dream life.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 12:36 PM   #2
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
[url="http://2012election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=004818"]...
Quote:
If you know about others, please contact us with details.
17) Liberals have more and better sex.

.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2015, 01:29 PM   #3
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Is that peer reviewed, or do you close your curtains?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 07:02 AM   #4
Sundae
polaroid of perfection
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
But what happens if you have a thin veneer of liberalism over a seething mass of right-wing fury when someone hurts you and yours?

Oh, wait. You end up a mentaller.
Fair enough.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac
Sundae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 10:22 AM   #5
Carruthers
Junior Master Dwellar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Buckinghamshire UK
Posts: 4,059
It seems I am a Conservative Liberal.

But only when I'm not being a Liberal Conservative.

Why is life so bloody difficult at times?
__________________
Carruthers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 10:37 AM   #6
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Maybe that's because you have a big anterior cingulate cortex and a big right amygdala,
along with certain other big body parts. (4)

.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 10:41 AM   #7
Carruthers
Junior Master Dwellar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Buckinghamshire UK
Posts: 4,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post

...along with certain other big body parts.

Modesty forbids.
__________________
Carruthers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 11:08 AM   #8
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Yeah - I'm as liberal as they come, but I'm a roiling ball of fear and anxiety and highly risk averse.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 11:25 AM   #9
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
The idea that my psychology informed my politics stopped me in my tracks. Why would I want to spread my fucked-up notions to the rest of the world?
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 01:59 PM   #10
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
I give it little or no credence, reverting to the correlation/causation thing, but the link saying, "peer reviewed", sparked my clicker.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 03:30 PM   #11
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
The idea that my psychology informed my politics stopped me in my tracks. Why would I want to spread my fucked-up notions to the rest of the world?
Because that's what separates us from the other animals.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2015, 07:02 AM   #12
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
We're separate?!?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2015, 10:38 AM   #13
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
As long as you pick the right distinguishing feature. Long necks separate giraffes from the other animals, and wanting to spread our fucked-up notions distinguishes us.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2015, 11:37 AM   #14
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
As long as you pick the right distinguishing feature. Long necks separate giraffes from the other animals, and wanting to spread our fucked-up notions distinguishes us.
Does that mean Donald Trump is a different animal?
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 12:30 PM   #15
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Robert Reich is most definitely left wing. His article at Huffpost, "What I Learned on My Red State Book Tour" is interesting. OK, the truth is it jibes with what I suspected, so I naturally believe it, but still.
Quote:
But something odd happened. It turned out that many of the conservative Republicans and Tea Partiers I met agreed with much of what I had to say -- and I agreed with them.

For example, most condemned what they called "crony capitalism," by which they mean big corporations getting sweetheart deals from the government because of lobbying and campaign contributions.

I met with group of small farmers in Missouri who were livid about growth of "factory farms" owned and run by big corporations, that abused land and cattle, damaged the environment, and ultimately harmed consumers. They claimed giant food processors were using their monopoly power to squeeze the farmers dry, and the government was doing squat about it because of Big Agriculture's money.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.