![]() |
|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Encroaching on your decrees
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: An island within the south-west coast of Scotland
Posts: 7,016
|
Ethics
I read the following on another forum:
" ... that the use of the term “ethical” carries a heavy weight of implications, and is more accurately describing a political point of view, particularly in the US." Is that really the case, my Merkin friends? And if so, which "political" point of view is referred to here? I know what the writer had in mind from the context, but wonder if that's really so for the majority of youse. Sent by thought transference
__________________
Living it up on the edge ... of civilisation, within the southwest coast of ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
To shreds, you say?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
|
sounds like BS to me. Ethical sems to be more legally oriented and moral seems to be more religiously oriented.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Yeah, what foot said.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
A lot of people on the fringes lay claim to "ethical" viewpoints in politics... I guess I always saw ethics as a subset of philosophy often claimed but rarely seen in law or politics.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Ethical and Political are unfortunately diametrically opposed here now. Anyone I hear using them in conjunction is automatically placed in the lying bastard file, until proven innocent.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
True, but groan.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
What are you principles? For example, what is the purpose of life in general; and your's in particular? If you cannot answer that, then you really do not know what is ethical. In a parallel example, Descarte justified the existance of the world starting with a basic supposition. "I think, therefore I am." From this, he built a large and complex philosphy. Socrates did something similar by asking damning questions; by exposing contradictions. In every case, these are great philosophers because they demanded underlying reasons for every conclusion. If asking what is ethical, then first define the underlying principles and reasons why that define your conclusion; to say what is ethical. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
It's true, I didn't pay a lot of attention to the big explosion in China, but if it had been in the US, I'd have gone online immediately for details.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 772
|
...Yes.
Ofcourse. Your views on ethics and your views on politics are both going to be extensions of your values. There is actually good research into moral psychology in this regard: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|