Conservatives ask FBI to investigate hotel porn

08-23-2006, 09:11 PM

Conservatives ask FBI to investigate hotel porn

Idiots. It can be blocked or ignored by those who don't want it, as it states in the article, by those not wanting it... I just don't see the issue.

Busybodies confuse the hell out of me.

Ibby · 08-23-2006, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

Busybodies confuse the hell out of me.

Amen.

Clodfobble · 08-23-2006, 11:38 PM

Quote:

The coalition also is trying to draw attention to CleanHotels.com, a directory of hotels and motels nationwide that pledge to exclude adult offerings from their in-room entertainment service.

Nothin' but a publicity stunt.

tw · 08-24-2006, 12:45 AM

If god wanted man to view others naked, then god would not have put clothes on people. If its appropriate, happy birthday no matter what your suit may be.

Sundae · 08-24-2006, 06:08 AM

God tucked ladies' rude bits inside for a reason. Showing them on hotel television sets is against reason and against God.

It's poor business sense anyway - if your customers go blind they won't buy any pay per view movies.

Elspode · 08-24-2006, 08:17 AM

CF is right. They're just garnering publicity for their "family friendly" hotel service (which is mentioned in the article).

Once again, it is all about the money.

Spexxvet · 08-24-2006, 09:07 AM

If I can't rub one out privately in my hotel room, I'll have to pick up some drunk chick in a bar, risk spreading disease and causing an unwanted pregnancy, and possible subsequent abortion or welfare case, or hire a hooker, continuing the exploitation of women and taking the same risks as already listed. They've taken away dildoes in some states, and now this! These conservative bastards don't want us to have any fun at all!

I'm just doing my part to help humanity through masturbation.

Elspode · 08-24-2006, 09:25 AM

Besides the money, there are those who also would like to ensure that no sex takes place unless it is with the blessing of God in the sacred union of marriage, and then preferably only for procreation, so we have plenty more little worshippers...and tithers.

Aratron · 08-24-2006, 10:15 PM

I agree with what rkze stated. It's not like the X-rated movies that are hosted in hotels are avaiable as soon as you put on your tv screens in the hotel rooms. You have a choice as to whether are not you want to view them, and wether or not you want to block them. I mean if you have a 13 yr that you do not trust and you do not want them ordering this stuff, simply have it blocked, it's not that difficult to accomplish. The conservates need to stop wasting their time with petty, meaningless stories and focus on the real issues right now like the war in Iraq and the still devastung hardships of Katrina.

08-23-2006, 09:11 PM	#1
rkzenrage Guest Posts: n/a	Conservatives ask FBI to investigate hotel porn Conservatives ask FBI to investigate hotel porn Idiots. It can be blocked or ignored by those who don't want it, as it states in the article, by those not wanting it... I just don't see the issue. Busybodies confuse the hell out of me.

08-24-2006, 06:08 AM	#5
Sundae polaroid of perfection Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 24,185	God tucked ladies' rude bits inside for a reason. Showing them on hotel television sets is against reason and against God. It's poor business sense anyway - if your customers go blind they won't buy any pay per view movies. __________________ Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac

08-24-2006, 08:17 AM	#6
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	CF is right. They're just garnering publicity for their "family friendly" hotel service (which is mentioned in the article). Once again, it is all about the money. __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

08-24-2006, 09:07 AM	#7
Spexxvet Makes some feel uncomfortable Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 10,346	If I can't rub one out privately in my hotel room, I'll have to pick up some drunk chick in a bar, risk spreading disease and causing an unwanted pregnancy, and possible subsequent abortion or welfare case, or hire a hooker, continuing the exploitation of women and taking the same risks as already listed. They've taken away dildoes in some states, and now this! These conservative bastards don't want us to have any fun at all! I'm just doing my part to help humanity through masturbation. __________________ "I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce

08-24-2006, 09:25 AM	#8
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	Besides the money, there are those who also would like to ensure that no sex takes place unless it is with the blessing of God in the sacred union of marriage, and then preferably only for procreation, so we have plenty more little worshippers...and tithers. __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

08-24-2006, 12:45 AM	#4
tw Read? I only know how to write. Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 11,933	If god wanted man to view others naked, then god would not have put clothes on people. If its appropriate, happy birthday no matter what your suit may be.

08-24-2006, 10:15 PM	#9
Aratron Liquid Alchemist Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5	I agree with what rkze stated. It's not like the X-rated movies that are hosted in hotels are avaiable as soon as you put on your tv screens in the hotel rooms. You have a choice as to whether are not you want to view them, and wether or not you want to block them. I mean if you have a 13 yr that you do not trust and you do not want them ordering this stuff, simply have it blocked, it's not that difficult to accomplish. The conservates need to stop wasting their time with petty, meaningless stories and focus on the real issues right now like the war in Iraq and the still devastung hardships of Katrina.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)