San Francisco vs McDonalds, McDonalds wins

Undertoad · 11-30-2011, 10:51 AM

City of SF: "We are the Nanny City and we think selling fast food to youngsters is terrible. So we are targeting one in particular, the Happy Meal. From now on, you cannot include a free toy in any meal with over 600 calories that does not include fruit or vegetables."

McDonalds: "OK, we will now sell the Happy Meal without a toy. And because the Toy is so popular, we will also sell a Toy for ten cents, proceeds to charity."

City of SF: "Great victory!"

McDonalds: "Oh and one more thing: you can no longer buy a Toy separately. You can only buy a Toy if you also buy a Happy Meal. We think we will sell more Happy Meals than ever. Thanks SF!"

City of SF: "What?"

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/...alds_outsm.php

classicman · 11-30-2011, 10:54 AM

Ha Ha Ha... Did that really happen? Is that what the McD's are doing?

eta - just saw the link. oops

Clodfobble · 11-30-2011, 11:16 AM

So you used to be able to buy the toy alone for $2.18. And the cost of a happy meal is $2.99 (or now $3.09, with the 10 cent surcharge.) So were they drastically overcharging for the toy, or is a Happy Meal's food content really only worth 81 cents?

Regardless, I do not buy the idea that there were lines of parents driving through just to buy the toys by themselves. What was happening was fatass children were buying adult-sized meals, and also getting a toy. So now those fatass children will have to make do with less food, or eat two Happy Meals. They'll still be fatasses, either way.

San Francisco went about this the wrong way. You can't legislate against a massive corporation from the bottom up.

infinite monkey · 11-30-2011, 11:31 AM

They should make everything smaller in McD's, starting with the seating.

"Sorry kids, we can't fit in there. Let's take the jumbo van to that new Salad Bar restaurant, at least until we can fit into McD's again."

Happy Monkey · 11-30-2011, 01:49 PM

This is why laws are a thousand pages long.

Griff · 11-30-2011, 02:20 PM

Maybe they should set a legal definition for meal. Something about a meal having actual people food in it?

infinite monkey · 11-30-2011, 02:29 PM

You mean like Soylent Green?

Aliantha · 11-30-2011, 03:43 PM

Man, a happy meal is almost $6 over here, regardless of whether you get the toy or not!

DucksNuts · 11-30-2011, 06:53 PM

I was thinking the same thing, Ali.

We have only been to Macca's twice since we have been up here, because;

a) 2 x 6 nugget happy meals, a snack wrap, a mcchicken meal and 2 sundaes = $30+ and the kids are still hungry, and the food is crap (mcchicken is for me, but they eat my chips)

b) Maddigan's cook fresh local seafood and supply 2 x serves of fish, with chips and salad for $9.50. 2 of these packs feed me and the kids and they arent hungry afterwards. If they are, theres an ice creamery right next door...still under $30 and much tastier food.

plthijinx · 11-30-2011, 11:01 PM

holy crap!!! 30+? really?

actually i can see that. spent $15 in paris on a big mac fries and a beer back in '94

TheMercenary · 12-01-2011, 05:15 AM

Yea! Gobberment is here to save us!

Clodfobble · 12-01-2011, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Yea! Gobberment is here to save us!

I agree, the government policy of low-quality food subsidies were intended to save us, but it has proven itself to be a huge mistake.

Griff · 12-01-2011, 03:22 PM

Pity the silly local government that attempts to resist the FED-CORP food machine. Soylent Green is corn-finished people!

ZenGum · 12-01-2011, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plthijinx

holy crap!!! 30+? really?

actually i can see that. spent $15 in paris on a big mac fries and a beer back in '94

"... and in Paris, you can get a beer in McDonald's. An you know what they call a quarter pounder in Europe?"

Man, you ARE bad-ass.

TheMercenary · 12-02-2011, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble

I agree, the government policy of low-quality food subsidies were intended to save us, but it has proven itself to be a huge mistake.

No one is forcing you to buy your kids a Happy Meal.

11-30-2011, 10:51 AM	#1
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	San Francisco vs McDonalds, McDonalds wins City of SF: "We are the Nanny City and we think selling fast food to youngsters is terrible. So we are targeting one in particular, the Happy Meal. From now on, you cannot include a free toy in any meal with over 600 calories that does not include fruit or vegetables." McDonalds: "OK, we will now sell the Happy Meal without a toy. And because the Toy is so popular, we will also sell a Toy for ten cents, proceeds to charity." City of SF: "Great victory!" McDonalds: "Oh and one more thing: you can no longer buy a Toy separately. You can only buy a Toy if you also buy a Happy Meal. We think we will sell more Happy Meals than ever. Thanks SF!" City of SF: "What?" http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/...alds_outsm.php

11-30-2011, 10:54 AM	#2
classicman barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy. Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 23,401	Ha Ha Ha... Did that really happen? Is that what the McD's are doing? eta - just saw the link. oops __________________ "like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt

11-30-2011, 11:16 AM	#3
Clodfobble UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 20,012	So you used to be able to buy the toy alone for $2.18. And the cost of a happy meal is $2.99 (or now $3.09, with the 10 cent surcharge.) So were they drastically overcharging for the toy, or is a Happy Meal's food content really only worth 81 cents? Regardless, I do not buy the idea that there were lines of parents driving through just to buy the toys by themselves. What was happening was fatass children were buying adult-sized meals, and also getting a toy. So now those fatass children will have to make do with less food, or eat two Happy Meals. They'll still be fatasses, either way. San Francisco went about this the wrong way. You can't legislate against a massive corporation from the bottom up. __________________ My book My other book My spirit animal

11-30-2011, 01:49 PM	#5
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	This is why laws are a thousand pages long. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

11-30-2011, 02:20 PM	#6
Griff still says videotape Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 26,813	Maybe they should set a legal definition for meal. Something about a meal having actual people food in it? __________________ If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis

11-30-2011, 11:31 AM	#4
infinite monkey Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 13,002	They should make everything smaller in McD's, starting with the seating. "Sorry kids, we can't fit in there. Let's take the jumbo van to that new Salad Bar restaurant, at least until we can fit into McD's again."

11-30-2011, 02:29 PM	#7
infinite monkey Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 13,002	You mean like Soylent Green?

11-30-2011, 03:43 PM	#8
Aliantha trying hard to be a better person Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 16,493	Man, a happy meal is almost $6 over here, regardless of whether you get the toy or not! __________________ Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber

11-30-2011, 06:53 PM	#9
DucksNuts Bitchy Little Brat Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Queensland, Australia Posts: 5,067	I was thinking the same thing, Ali. We have only been to Macca's twice since we have been up here, because; a) 2 x 6 nugget happy meals, a snack wrap, a mcchicken meal and 2 sundaes = $30+ and the kids are still hungry, and the food is crap (mcchicken is for me, but they eat my chips) b) Maddigan's cook fresh local seafood and supply 2 x serves of fish, with chips and salad for $9.50. 2 of these packs feed me and the kids and they arent hungry afterwards. If they are, theres an ice creamery right next door...still under $30 and much tastier food.

11-30-2011, 11:01 PM	#10
plthijinx Master Dwellar Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 4,197	holy crap!!! 30+? really? actually i can see that. spent $15 in paris on a big mac fries and a beer back in '94 __________________ For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream.

12-01-2011, 05:15 AM	#11
TheMercenary “Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo” Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Savannah, Georgia Posts: 21,393	Yea! Gobberment is here to save us! __________________ Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!

12-01-2011, 03:22 PM	#13
Griff still says videotape Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 26,813	Pity the silly local government that attempts to resist the FED-CORP food machine. Soylent Green is corn-finished people! __________________ If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)