ATTN: Lumberjim

I had to talk to him on the phone in order to set up the date... you know what I mean? Internet dating is stupid. Anyway, it turned out that he was really cool and I liked him. He looks kind of like a bizarre cross between Jake Gyllenhaal and a young Bill Murray, and he's smart and funny, and he talks too much but it was more interesting/good than he was on the phone. So that's all good.

Originally Posted by lumberjim

the post i deleted was a photshop job of a mirror with you(your cellar profile pic) in it in response to the post about my 'sense of righteous indignation'

Like that wouldn't have been funny?

[Sheldonrs]

Originally Posted by richlevy

Sheldon, you're gay. If you're breeding, you're doing it wrong.

How about selective seeding?

[DucksNuts]

Originally Posted by Tiki

I'd say it's possible to be a selective whore.

Ohhh, no, its just the *going rate* that changes. Girls gotta have some standards, even when there's money involved

[Kaliayev]

Originally Posted by lumberjim

no.....cain, malachite, the pariah's shots meant nothing to me....they're the element that i dislike about PD. snotty college boys.

I wasn't going to get involved in this, but like the Devil, you say my name and I shall appear.

First,

Secondly,

Thirdly, if you think that's snotty, do never go to St Andrews, Oxford, Cambridge or Warwick. Double-barrel names and family trees going back over 500 years abound. Arrogance is bred in the bone, a way of life. By comparison, I'm a weekend amateur.

Fourthly, don't bring a knife to a gunfight. You were the one who started acting snotty and condescending (and still are. I mean, "college boys", really? Not only is that a lazy attempt to paint people disagreeing with you as immature, its a bad one, because usually you need to be at least reasonably smart to get into a Higher Education facility). The only reason you're upset about it is because I'm better at it, which is quite hypocritical.

Fifthly, apologies to everyone else for continuing this thread. I really didn't want to get into anything over here, as cross-forum fighting is both lame and boring for those who are not involved. However, I was brought up, and felt I should defend myself. Hopefully, Lumberjim will see the error of his ways and this will come to an end.

[Spexxvet]

Ah, the memories. Good times.... good times. This is the Cellar at its best, isn't it? LJ behaves obnoxiously, someone calls him on it, a flame war ensues, and people come out of the woodwork just to pile on.

Remember this?

[Kaliayev]

Well, I wasn't so much in the 'woodwork' as 'a bottle of scotch'...but I'm not sure if that really counts.

ZL,
tries not to post on the internets when drunk, for good reasons.

Originally Posted by DucksNuts

Ohhh, no, its just the *going rate* that changes. Girls gotta have some standards, even when there's money involved

A whore is not necessarily a prostitute. It also simply means a promiscuous person.

[Sheldonrs]

Originally Posted by Tiki

A whore is not necessarily a prostitute. It also simply means a promiscuous person.

Whew!!! I was worried people would think I was a prostitute!

[Clodfobble]

I disagree. A slut may be promiscuous just for fun, but a whore gets some sort of compensation. An attention whore, for example, will perform a variety of unusual acts for the payment of others' attention.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Hey, hold my beer and watch this...

[Shawnee123]

I've got the attention whore thing down, but am still unable to figure out how to parlay that into a compensated position.

Should I move from Hobby Ho to Pro Ho?

[monster]

Shawnee, you'll be compensated in heaven, my dear....

[Shawnee123]

God I sure as hell hope so, 'cause the status quo SUCKS (and not in a good way.)

Originally Posted by Clodfobble

I disagree. A slut may be promiscuous just for fun, but a whore gets some sort of compensation. An attention whore, for example, will perform a variety of unusual acts for the payment of others' attention.

You can disagree, but you'll be disagreeing with Merriam-Webster. Look it up.