Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
Holder drives the train. The result is nothing short of Affirmative Action, which is a racist program in and of itself. He could have stopped it, just like he did when he stopped the action against the voter intimidation case. Everything he does is suspect as being race motivated as evidenced by the testimony of the whistleblowers in the voter case.
|
In fact, he couldnt have just not enforced a court order w/o being in contempt of court, far different from making a determination to file a civil injunction as opposed to a criminal complaint in the NBP case.
Ah...I see.
Corrective affirmation action (short of hard quotas) is a racist program.
So does that make every every president since the 60s, the Supreme Court on numerous occasions, and much of the public racists? Or basically, anyone who doesnt share your position on affirmative action.
added:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
Facts are facts. They stand alone. I have sited three cases where this DOJ has corrupted it authority and gone outside the law. All I can hope for it that Holder goes down in flames and Obama is a one term president. 
|
Actually, the fact is that in the Dayton case, Holder acted within the law by enforcing the court order but you want him to go outside the law.
BTW, he didnt go outside the law in the NBP case either.
I'm so confused.