Bush documents faked?

Undertoad · 09-10-2004, 02:11 AM

Page 1 of the Washington Post: Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush

It turns out Little Green Footballs was the one to point out the MS Word similarity. (Fox News picked that up, which is where I saw it.) LGF points out that the superscript th differences on screen disappear when you print the document. LGF overlays a modern MS Word doc over the memo and it matches exactly, even the vertical spacing and curly-q single-quote marks.

I'm convinced. These documents were not written in 1972.

09-10-2004, 02:11 AM	#10
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	Page 1 of the Washington Post: Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush It turns out Little Green Footballs was the one to point out the MS Word similarity. (Fox News picked that up, which is where I saw it.) LGF points out that the superscript th differences on screen disappear when you print the document. LGF overlays a modern MS Word doc over the memo and it matches exactly, even the vertical spacing and curly-q single-quote marks. I'm convinced. These documents were not written in 1972.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)