The proper role and scope of government

[henry quirk]

Me neither, which is why it irks me you fixated on "In my view: to not exist." as the answer to the question of 'what is the proper role and scope of government?' when the bulk of my post (#8) was given over to the notion of proxyhood (or, extremely limited government) as preferable to 'governance' (in the current form).

I may be anarchistic, but I'm not advocating an anarchy. Any lazy shit reading your post (and not bothering to go up-thread to read my post) is sure to take me as some of rabid libertarian-type.

Next thing I'll know: said lazy shit will bring up Somalia as my idea of heaven... ...which it's not.

I'm quite capable of painting myself into a corner without others lending a hand by way of out-of-context quotes...just sayin'...

#

"the U.S. is a very, very peaceful, nice, fair, equitable, and just place"

Trundle over to the 'wall street occupied' thread for opposing views...me: I'm content here despite the fact I don't think America is all that peaceful, nice, fair, etc.