marriage

henry quirk · 10-17-2014, 10:22 AM

"the voters will create pressure to make the arbitration to work according to the community standards"

The voters 'could' (not 'will').

The voters ‘could’ also move to amend the Federal Constitution and bring back slavery.

Would you support such a thing?

I'm wondering how many contracts between folks today (properties, services, etc.) are overtly blunted or directed by the voters?

#

And: this "this marital contract is valid even though it is between a 40-year-old man and a 9-year-old girl" is not possible (as discussed up-thread) for reasons that have nuthin' to do with voters.

10-17-2014, 10:22 AM	#25
henry quirk maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 2,162	"the voters will create pressure to make the arbitration to work according to the community standards" The voters 'could' (not 'will'). The voters ‘could’ also move to amend the Federal Constitution and bring back slavery. Would you support such a thing? I'm wondering how many contracts between folks today (properties, services, etc.) are overtly blunted or directed by the voters? # And: this "this marital contract is valid even though it is between a 40-year-old man and a 9-year-old girl" is not possible (as discussed up-thread) for reasons that have nuthin' to do with voters.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)