To XHTML or not to?

03-10-2002, 05:17 PM

Because I am stupid, I hand code all HTML, and it's all generally prett y simple and elegant. I don't use any fancy tools - VIM is it. However, I think there is definitely a place for newer stuff like Flash. I personally want to use Flash on my new site to do some artsy fartsy stuff, but that's just me.

Anyway, the point is, I think for just simple information, straight HTML is fine. For sites where you actually want to <b>present</b> something, do whatever you want. As long as I can view it on Linux

View Poll Results: What browsers do you support?
Netscape 2 and IE 2 or newer.	1	14.29%
Netscape 3 and IE 3 or newer.	0	0%
Netscape 4 and IE 4 or newer.	2	28.57%
DOM and CSS compatible (Mozilla, IE5, Opera) and newer.	3	42.86%
Only IE6 with Flash, Shockware, QuickTime, Windows Media Player, Real Player, Beatnik, VRML, Java 1.4 or newer.	1	14.29%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

03-10-2002, 05:17 PM	#2
dave Guest Posts: n/a	Because I am stupid, I hand code all HTML, and it's all generally prett y simple and elegant. I don't use any fancy tools - VIM is it. However, I think there is definitely a place for newer stuff like Flash. I personally want to use Flash on my new site to do some artsy fartsy stuff, but that's just me. Anyway, the point is, I think for just simple information, straight HTML is fine. For sites where you actually want to <b>present</b> something, do whatever you want. As long as I can view it on Linux

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)