Proclaiming Liberalism, and What It Now Means

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

I would always be in favor for the UN to take care of genocide and peacekeeping over any specific country. That has a different set of problems though.


Yeah, we have internal issues we have to worry about now and they are only getting worse so we should concentrate more of our attention and money on those instead of external affairs that will most likely have the same result. I don't really think this matters anyways since there is no candidate that has a chance of getting elected that I can seriously see pulling us out of Iraq. All of the republicans are pro-war (except Paul but he doesn't have a chance) and for the democrats....Obama I can see but I will not trust him until he proves me wrong. Edwards the same as Obama. Clinton is a joke.

I find that this run for the White House will be similar to 2000 and 2004 in the sense that it will be either a vote for the best of two evils or a "no" vote against one canidate or another. "Out of Iraq" will be the inevitable mantra of the Dems and they will more than likely win on that. The larger question is will who ever eventually pulls us out of Iraq accept responsibility for the eventual genocide.

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

The larger question is will who ever eventually pulls us out of Iraq accept responsibility for the eventual genocide.

It will be blamed on Bush no matter the outcome...

I find that this run for the White House will be similar to 2000 and 2004 in the sense that it will be either a vote for the best of two evils or a "no" vote against one canidate or another.

I agree, but there are some republicans that I really don't trust and are way too delusional about the terrorist threat.