The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2007, 09:24 AM   #1
jdlaw
Jeff Dickstein
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
16th Amendment and Ratification

The courts have never ruled the 16th Amendment wasn't properly ratified. The courts have ruled they are precluded from addressing the issue.

There is current litigation before the Federal District Court in Chicago regarding this issue. The case is United States v. Benson, Case No. 1:04-cv-07403 (N.D.Ill.E.D. 2004). Complete details of the case, including the facts of non-ratification and the court's refusal to hear the issue are on my website. The link is available on my profile.

Jeff Dickstein
Attorney at Law
jdlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2007, 01:03 PM   #2
slang
St Petersburg, Florida
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlaw View Post
The courts have never ruled the 16th Amendment wasn't properly ratified. The courts have ruled they are precluded from addressing the issue.
There have been some cases recently ( 3 months or so ) that have found non-filers and "tax cheats" completely innocent in court.

I do believe that the government will arrest and jail you for not filing and paying their income tax, but I'm very skeptical as to how they might do that with the way that the "laws" are written and the rights that you have to give up just to comply.
slang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2007, 02:13 PM   #3
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlaw View Post
The courts have never ruled the 16th Amendment wasn't properly ratified. The courts have ruled they are precluded from addressing the issue.

There is current litigation before the Federal District Court in Chicago regarding this issue. The case is United States v. Benson, Case No. 1:04-cv-07403 (N.D.Ill.E.D. 2004). Complete details of the case, including the facts of non-ratification and the court's refusal to hear the issue are on my website. The link is available on my profile.

Jeff Dickstein
Attorney at Law
Many legal scholars would disagree with you.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.