|
|
|||||||
| Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
| View Poll Results: Is being gay morally wrong? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
6 | 11.76% |
| No |
  
|
42 | 82.35% |
| Depends |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Other |
  
|
3 | 5.88% |
| Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
01-25-2008, 01:44 PM
|
#1 |
|
Looking forward to open mic night.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 5,148
|
Kant was interested in furthering his own religious propaganda. Saying that homosexuality is unnatural and against god....(furthering his calssifications) Well there needs to be proof. Kant never provided that. If anyone is willing to provide the proof of the unnaturalness of homosexuality, then I'm willing to look at it.
I'm thinking you Kant. ha ha...not funny. Sorry.  Otherwise Kant is an improper cite for the question at hand. And also was cited improperly...I have my reservations about this discussion at all.
__________________
Show me a sane man, and I will cure him for you.- Carl Jung
|
|
|
|
01-26-2008, 03:22 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Half-Awesome
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
And yes the problem that you going to get with theological argument over proof is the same that you get over debates of psychoanalysis, that is, that what is being tested is not open for inspection. arguably.
__________________
Is it possible to go off topic in a Philosophy forum? Answers on a postcard please. Last edited by Kerotan; 01-26-2008 at 03:22 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
