Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary
I know exactly where he plans on getting it. And that was the point.
|
Much of the cost savings that will be passed on to consumers will result from computerizing the health care system.
I dont know how it is in Australia, but in the US, a relatively small percentage of doctors and hospitals are using or maximizing their use of health information technology systems
A
Rand report (pdf)found that implementing health IT would result in
a mean annual savings of $40 billion over a 15-year period by improving health outcomes through care management, increasing efficiency, and reducing medical errors.
In terms of the $20 billion for health care IT in the stimulus package, a
Harvard researcher suggests that the $20 bill investment in health care IT is in fact a both stimulus (creating thousands of jobs) and a means to make health care more efficient and less costly over a period of a few years.
I dont take these studies at face value, but I am inclined to take them as more credible than the unsubstantiated opinion of the editorial writer in the initial article that suggested the health IT investment in the stimulus bill would be "dangerous to your health" and was to "enable the government to dictate to doctors how to treat patients."