Al Franken...is this for real?

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Redux

My deal still holds.

I wont cite any editorials, blogs or other questionable sources as undisputed factual information if you dont.

I have no problem sticking to primary source information when the discussion calls for facts and not opinions.

Let me know if you wanna play by those rules...but it will limit your bullshit

I just refuse to see the world through your Obama colored glasses and call bullshit on your partisan pandering. It must bother you when people don't agree with your world views.

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

I just refuse to see the world through your Obama colored glasses and call bullshit on your partisan pandering. It must bother you when people don't agree with your world views.

So I guess that means "No Deal"

Thats cool.

I will still try to cite acts of Congress, reports from non-partisan sources like the GAO or CBO or other source materials as often as I can ( I admit to falling back on biased sources on a few occasions)...

And you will cite your editorials and blogs like Malkin that support your pre-conceived opinions and imply or infer some degree of credibility.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Redux

So I guess that means "No Deal"

Thats cool.

I will still try to cite acts of Congress, reports from non-partisan sources like the GAO or CBO or other source materials as often as I can ( I admit to falling back on biased sources on a few occasions)...

And you will cite your editorials and blogs like Malkin that support your pre-conceived opinions and imply or infer some degree of credibility.

Whatever dude. Your "facts" are nothing more than smoke in mirrors as you try to deflect what is really happening on the ground. You need to take off your partisan glasses and see what is going on around you. But that is cool. Have fun in your world.