![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
I'm confused what it is you think this article has to do with Obamacare, one way or the other.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Primarily just being facetious...
There are comments in the article about Medicare patients not being served, and the coming standards for reimbursements, and physicians' practice of accepting only private-pay (or private insurance) patients. I do think that unless something is done to ultimately require physicians and hospitals to accept Medicare reimbursements, this direction of seeking the wealthy patients will only increase, so more and more patients will be turned away. The smaller hospitals will probably see this as their way to go, and so those ER's will only stabilize the patients and transport them to larger "teaching" and "county" facilities that do accept Medicare. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
|
I agree that medicine is a business, but disagree about the reason rural hospitals send patients to larger facilities. It IS about the skills of the staff and having access to the most up to date diagnostics and newer, more sophisticated treatments. A hospital in a town of 10,000 just can't afford the latest and greatest, and really good physicians do not gravitate to rural backwaters for obvious reasons.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|