The Real Mitt Romney

[tw]

Originally Posted by Adak

Your observations, are not just your feelings. They are factual, but not enough for a full statistical measure,

Total and insulting bullshit. A conclusion from observation was, at best, only a wild speculation. We were all taught about junk science in second grade. Spontaneous reproduction. Life is created by flooding a pond. Observation proves it. Only the most naive assume observation is fact.

Moldy bread breeds maggots. Also well proven by observation. Because junk science (also called lying to oneself) is knowledge from observation. This is second grade science. Must extremists be taught second grade science?

You demonstrate why propaganda and ideology are posted by you as facts. You do not even know the difference between junk science reasoning and what is required to have facts. Your fundamental problem has been identified.

How to identify anyone easily manipulated by rhetoric? He does not post numbers. Adak, you never post numbers. Your subjective reasoning is another symptom of junk science.

A classic lie: tax cuts create jobs. Even observation demonstrates that false. Why do you ignore observation when it contradicts your extremist political ideology? Observation is only valid when convenient?

Knowledge from observation is classic junk science. Observation says tax cuts destroys jobs. Why do you ignore observations when it contradicts your extremist political views? Anyone can speculate by observing your posts. And always come to the same conclusion. Extremism justified by myths is alive and well.