The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2013, 03:49 PM   #1
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Glatt, "deficit" is for a particular period of time, whereas "debt" is the cumulated deficits

So I look on GDP as the total output of energy and resources ($) of the country.
So, looking at a given year's deficit as a %GDP is a measure of what
the country would have to expend to reduce that deficit (to zero).

OTOH, higher inflation has the effect in future years of
reducing the subsequent debt-to-%GDP ratios
... i.e., older debts can be paid off with "cheaper" dollars

BUT, I'm open to being educated out of the error of my ways.

.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 04:36 PM   #2
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
Glatt, "deficit" is for a particular period of time, whereas "debt" is the cumulated deficits

So I look on GDP as the total output of energy and resources ($) of the country.
So, looking at a given year's deficit as a %GDP is a measure of what
the country would have to expend to reduce that deficit (to zero).

OTOH, higher inflation has the effect in future years of
reducing the subsequent debt-to-%GDP ratios
... i.e., older debts can be paid off with "cheaper" dollars

BUT, I'm open to being educated out of the error of my ways.

.
My issue with % of GDP is that the government doesn't have access to the entire GDP to spend it. I think a more useful statistic might be to see a % of the total revenue.

But I'm no economist.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 06:16 PM   #3
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Such as this ... From here
Attached Images
 
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 06:48 PM   #4
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Truckers are trying to organize a strike and occupy DC this weekend.

The first come-on is to protest the government shutdown.
But then if you drill down one step, it is to protest "government corruption"
And then if you drill down further, it becomes a far right-wing jumble.

Some trucker groups are backing away, some large outfits are too.
So if you plan to be in DC this weekend, don't be surprised by some big-rig traffic jams.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 06:17 PM   #5
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
Truckers are trying to organize a strike and occupy DC this weekend.

The first come-on is to protest the government shutdown.
But then if you drill down one step, it is to protest "government corruption"
And then if you drill down further, it becomes a far right-wing jumble.<snip>
More recent articles are pretty much just copying the following...


Fox News

10/11/13
Dozens, not thousands, show up for DC trucker protest

Quote:
Virginia state police say they stopped four tractor-trailer drivers on the Beltway,
pulling them over after they began driving side-by side across
all four northbound lanes of the Beltway in Fairfax County.
Their actions slowed traffic to about 15 mph.
Officers warned the drivers not to impede traffic and did not write any tickets.

Police say a convoy of about 30 trucks began traveling north on Interstate 95
from Doswell, Va., on Friday morning. The truckers are circling the Beltway.

However, the presence was not quite the thousands of truckers that organizers had predicted.
On Friday morning, just a handful of people had showed up at a key staging area.

On its website, the group lists several demands, including
that President Obama resign immediately,
that the debt ceiling not be raised and that
National Security Agency surveillance of communications be ceased.

The group is also complaining about low wages and rising fuel costs.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 12:30 AM   #6
gvidas
Hoodoo Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
My issue with % of GDP is that the government doesn't have access to the entire GDP to spend it. I think a more useful statistic might be to see a % of the total revenue.

But I'm no economist.
It isn't that the number is literally relevant. The point is that neither the deficit as an absolute number, nor the GDP as an absolute number, is terribly meaningful -- they both need to be contextualized. To do this, you can compare them to one another, and look at relative changes.

A crude example: spending $100 a month on a cell phone with a good data plan is a big deal if you're 16 and work part-time at McDonalds; if you're an investment banker pulling in 6 figures a year, it's a fairly minor expense. You can represent this in general by looking at an expenditure as a percentage of annual income.
gvidas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.