|
07-09-2015, 06:46 PM
|
#16 | |
|
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
Yeah....but...what you'd lose in weight in terms of percentage of the whole - would be less than what you'd lose in height, in terms of percentage of the whole - so ...effectively you'd be heavier for your height than before the foot chopping.
and you'd probably get a lot less exercise ... so you'd end up heavier in real terms Overall I'm against foot amputation as a weight loss strategy. Just not effective.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2015, 05:30 PM
|
#17 |
|
The Un-Tuckian
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Central...KY that is
Posts: 39,517
|
Go right for the head amputation. Weighs more than a foot, and the head amputation more than likely improves the environment. For others.
__________________
 These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, EPA, FBI, DEA, CDC, or FDIC. These statements are not intended to diagnose, cause, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you feel you have been harmed/offended by, or, disagree with any of the above statements or images, please feel free to fuck right off. |
|
|
|
|
07-14-2015, 09:03 PM
|
#18 |
|
I love it when a plan comes together.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
|
"I once lost 120 unwanted lbs. practically overnight"
"Oh yeah! How'd you do that?" "I got divorced." |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
