Only 1,162 days til the election

[Radar]

I'm actually considering putting my name on the ballot next year against Maxine Waters.

[lumberjim]

1161 days now

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Don't give your vote or your money to the Democrats. They thought the first Clinton was a good idea. This other Clinton is at bottom a Socialist. Neither is good for the Republic.

[Radar]

I'll take the worst Clinton over the best Bush.

[WabUfvot5]

I'll take who ever isn't beholden to greed or power. In other words to the guillotine with 'em all! Err, probably 3rd party again.

[Griff]

Originally Posted by Jebediah

I'll take who ever isn't beholden to greed or power. In other words to the guillotine with 'em all! Err, probably 3rd party again.

Amen.

[richlevy]

Originally Posted by Jebediah

I'll take who ever isn't beholden to greed or power. In other words to the guillotine with 'em all! Err, probably 3rd party again.

I don't know. At least McCain coauthored the McCain-Feingold Act on campaign reform. You can also tell he's an honest man by the fact the he lost to Bush by refusing to suck up to special interests and fight dirty. Even if Karl wanted to work for him now that his current meal ticket is leaving thanks to term limits (which is fast becoming my favorite amendment), I think McCain might prefer putting his foot up Karl's ass.

I would like to see the networks cover more than two candidates. I think anyone who gets registered in all 50 states should be given equal time.

Bush would not have survived a three way debate with Kerry and McCain. Two genuine blooded veterans against a stuffed uniform. Since Bush was technically in the service, I will not call him a chicken hawk, but there is no way anyone who has not actually been on the line can appreciate war the way someone who has been can.

[Clodfobble]

Originally Posted by richlevy

Bush would not have survived a three way debate with Kerry and McCain.

That's the funny thing about debates, though. Take, for example, the first debate between Kerry and Bush. Everyone I know, on both political sides, agrees that Bush lost that debate hardcore. Yet somehow he won. Intellectuals want debates to mean a lot more than they do, because they feel that if a person is demonstrably shown to be a moron, then any thinking voter surely would not vote for that man.

But the debates mean little-to-nothing, ultimately, and the only good they'll ever really do is giving coverage to otherwise-unknown third party candidates, which I really wish would happen--except it won't, because the debates are agreed upon by the candidates, and no Rep or Dem candidate would ever want to admit there were other options out there.

[richlevy]

Originally Posted by Clodfobble

That's the funny thing about debates, though. Take, for example, the first debate between Kerry and Bush. Everyone I know, on both political sides, agrees that Bush lost that debate hardcore. Yet somehow he won. Intellectuals want debates to mean a lot more than they do, because they feel that if a person is demonstrably shown to be a moron, then any thinking voter surely would not vote for that man.

Actually, I think the debates were the reason the election was a close as it was. IMO, the Swift Boat Vets' role was not only to smear Kerry, but to distract from Bush's dismal performance in the debates.

Also, noone can say that they didn't get a good look at the candidates. For all of the rehearsal, Bush came across as a pure social conservative. Looking at that debate, everyone knew what his position on stem cells would be.

If %30 of the Republican party wasn't made up of single-issue social conservatives who will basically be willing to stifle any reservations and vote, then Bush would have lost the election.

Essentially, since the single minded people are making it a point to vote, it is the responsibility of people who do actually watch and decide to also vote, in the primaries and the election.

I figure either Jeb Bush or a member of the Saudi royal family. Decisions, decisions..

[xoxoxoBruce]

it is the responsibility of people who do actually watch and decide to also vote, in the primaries and the election.

I think it's a goddamn shame you had to say that. I mean that's a given, it should be foremost in any citizens mind.
Unfortunately it has to be said over and over.........and over.

[WabUfvot5]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

I think it's a goddamn shame you had to say that. I mean that's a given, it should be foremost in any citizens mind.
Unfortunately it has to be said over and over.........and over.

What can you expect though? Many people work two jobs to make ends meet. They come home tired and want to relax before working again. Following debates and reading newspapers is fine if you have the time. The remaining listen to the nightly news or listen to those around them neither of which are really subjective.

An informed group of voters is necessary in a democracy. What we have now is neither informed or democratic.

[Radar]

The McCain-Feingold Act is a nightmare. It makes it virtually impossible for third parties to grow, and to raise money. It has destroyed the reform party, and caused such major re-structuring in the LP, I doubt we'll ever recover.

[wolf]

True enough. I understand that it did virtually nothing as far as the campaign finance parts, but what is the sense of restricting issue-oriented (as opposed to candidate oriented) advertising prior to an election?

I don't know about you guys, but I make voting choices based on issues, not based on the personality of a candidate.

[Happy Monkey]

As an aside, has anyone seen the story from Kentucky? If there's ever been a case of the coverup being worse than the crime...

The crime: patronage - giving jobs to campaign contributers.
The coverup: The Governor issues blanket pardons to anyone who might have been involved except himself, requests that the investigation therefore be dropped, and then pleads the fifth.

Of course, it is hard to say what the actual effect will be, since legally speaking a pardon must be accepted to take effect, and such acceptance is an admission of guilt (again, legally speaking).