D.U.C.E

[Rexmons]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

No more private property?

private property is fine, but a group getting together, buying an entire region and not allowing certain people in is not.

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

You have no idea how many countries don't have flush toilets

I'm sure at one time or another there were states that didnt have flush toilets either but once the american economy began working it's magic, everyone caught up

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Who is funding all these benefits the billions are suddenly getting?

you know how most our tax dollars right now are going towards "defense", well imagine if we cut 95% of that.

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Somehow being hacked with machetes would probably be off putting

Once again, the country will now have the benefit of the global army at there disposal, to help ensure citizen safety

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Wait and see if you feel the same way when you get into third grade.

I think you'll change your mind once you hit puberty.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by Rexmons

private property is fine, but a group getting together, buying an entire region and not allowing certain people in is not.

That's one of the most anti-American statements ever made. Private property for some but not for others. Sure, that'll bring peace and tranquility.

I'm sure at one time or another there were states that didnt have flush toilets either but once the american economy began working it's magic, everyone caught up

So you don't know history, no wonder you can't plan a rational future, "with the same freedom and luxuries as you have grown accustomed to as having here."

you know how most our tax dollars right now are going towards "defense", well imagine if we cut 95% of that.

Are you really that ignorant? Military spending is 21% of what the feds will spend this year. 60% is spent on the things like, "all the benefits which come with it." Who's going to pay for those benefits for the rest of the world?

Once again, the country will now have the benefit of the global army at there disposal, to help ensure citizen safety

Hey, what a great idea. No police, the "Global Army" will protect us from everything. Somebody else will have to call them though, after you've been hacked to pieces.

I think you'll change your mind once you hit puberty.

I don't want to reach a puberty where you are waiting to fuck me with your idiotic schemes.
It's crystal clear you don't understand how the economy works, how the military works, how government works and most dangerous, how people/society works.

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by Rexmons

I'm sure at one time or another there were states that didnt have flush toilets either but once the american economy began working it's magic, everyone caught up

American economy? The only way to get other countries up to the level as America is for them to work. If get into their politics it will only end up in pieces.

you know how most our tax dollars right now are going towards "defense", well imagine if we cut 95% of that.

You can not cut most of the funds. A lot of it goes to scholarships and other things that can not be cut.

Once again, the country will now have the benefit of the global army at there disposal, to help ensure citizen safety

Please explain.

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

No more private property?

He is talking about a stateless society much like real Communism (not USSR communism) or true anarchy. This type of thinking is usually any extreme left-economic style.

Who is funding all these benefits the billions are suddenly getting?

Not you. It would be the people that are multi-millionaires and billionaires.


The only way to get a world like Rexmons is proposing is make a very far-left economic society. If you did use captialism, it would never end up like that.

[Griff]

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

He is talking about a stateless society much like real Communism (not USSR communism) or true anarchy. This type of thinking is usually any extreme left-economic style.

He's saying super-state not stateless. I don't see how a government that removed from the people would be accountable. We've got a big enough bubble of unreality in DC, can you imagine when Pakistan hosts the world congress?

Anarchy (An-Cap flavored) I could live with, excepting that little problem where violent people keep trying to make governments to rule others.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

He is talking about a stateless society much like real Communism (not USSR communism) or true anarchy. This type of thinking is usually any extreme left-economic style.

He/she said private property was fine for some, that's communism where some (pigs) are more equal that others.

Not you. It would be the people that are multi-millionaires and billionaires.

If you took all the millionaire's and all the billionaire's, money, you wouldn't even come close to that tab.

The only way to get a world like Rexmons is proposing is make a very far-left economic society. If you did use captialism, it would never end up like that.

No, there is no way... at all, ever. It's a poorly thought out pipe dream.... John Lennon/Yoko Ono territory.

[Rexmons]

hawk basically im saying we'll have to pay 95% less because all the other countries are going to share the bill, not that im saying lets get rid of the military. also yea i think the whole "blowing up" thing might get you in trouble.

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by Rexmons

hawk basically im saying we'll have to pay 95% less because all the other countries are going to share the bill, not that im saying lets get rid of the military. also yea i think the whole "blowing up" thing might get you in trouble.

Those countries will need a miltary too so they will worrying about their own bill.