The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2007, 12:19 AM   #1
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sept. 11 was a terrorist attack. What is with the word games?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2007, 12:32 AM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkzenrage View Post
Sept. 11 was a terrorist attack. What is with the word games?
If it was only terrorism, then it did not justify full scale invasion. More died on 11 September than in Pearl Harbor. Those actions exceeded the domain of terrorism. But George Jr's administration knows, for example, if they can call insurgents Al Qaeda, then we will believe that myth. If he labels six misguided mass murders in Cherry Hill as Al Qaeda, then many here will believe that also.

11 September clearly exceeded the definition of terrorism. You might call it terrorism plus just to feel better. But 11 September met a criteria that justifies full scale war - invasion of a sovereign nation. Terrorism would not justify such a response.

If you like calling it only trivial terrorism, then do it. But when it comes to measuring what justifies a full scale war - terrorism does not qualify. 11 September clearly was a smoking gun that justified war.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2007, 08:46 AM   #3
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
If he labels six misguided mass murders in Cherry Hill as Al Qaeda, then many here will believe that also.
Minor point. The Cherry Hill six didn't murder anyone nor have they been convicted of intending to, yet. So calling them "misguided mass murders" is the equivalent of calling them Al Qaeda.... which reinforces your point.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2007, 06:03 PM   #4
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
If it was only terrorism, then it did not justify full scale invasion. More died on 11 September than in Pearl Harbor. Those actions exceeded the domain of terrorism.
It most certainly did justify it. It does not justify it because you say it did not? what a crock...


(not talking Iraq here)
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2007, 12:21 PM   #5
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
It most certainly did justify it. It does not justify it because you say it did not? what a crock...


(not talking Iraq here)
From the same post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
11 September clearly exceeded the definition of terrorism. You might call it terrorism plus just to feel better. But 11 September met a criteria that justifies full scale war - invasion of a sovereign nation. Terrorism would not justify such a response.

If you like calling it only trivial terrorism, then do it. But when it comes to measuring what justifies a full scale war - terrorism does not qualify. 11 September clearly was a smoking gun that justified war.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.