![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
I understood that the maneuver was to prevent any House members (Dem or GOP)
from calling up or introducing a "clean Bill" for the shut down or debt limit. Boehner just may have given the bullet for Cantor's gun to replace him as Speaker |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
For the Adak's and others who think a default would have no effect...
NY times MARK LANDLER October 15, 2013 Seeing Its Own Money at Risk, China Rails at U.S. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
Boehner can bring any bill he likes to the floor whenever he wants. The discharge petition was supposed to be a way to break the type of logjam that the tea party caused. It's convenient and efficient to have a Speaker who runs things, but the discharge petition was supposed to be a way for a majority of congresspeople regardless of party, to overrule the Speaker in special circumstances. The House GOP leadership changed the rule to prevent that.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Thank you!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
"...others who think a default would have no effect..."
Assuming it gets that far: of course it'll have an effect. That's what I'm countin' on. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Of course extremist will say that is not a problem. These are the same people who created that massive recession in 2007 - almost created another 1929 and 40% unemployment. People forget how close we came to falling off the cliff because wackos said, "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter" and even tried to put Social Security into the stock market. Apparently extremist routinely forget the lesson of history – especially their own mistakes. Ironically, I make money if the wacko extremists do make America fail. Says how much faith I have in Cantor and the boys. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
I guess my sense of humor towards the GOP is returning... slowly.
How about this headline... Forbes Rick Ungar 10/16/2013 The Houston Chronicle Un-Endorses Ted Cruz Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
The Senate has passed:
Quote:
The "Obama can waive the debt ceiling" thing is interesting. I'm sure if he does it, he'll be screamed at, but if he waits to the last second he can appear all "Daddy disciplining the squabbling children", and Boehner can then be all "I would have fought to my last breath, but Obama stopped me". Win-win.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
And it's over (for a few months). With 87 Republicans voting aye.
Would have been nice if they'd done it a couple of weeks ago.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Lecturer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
Pro's: 1) They mobilized their base - they hadn't done that in a long time. 2) They let Obama show himself as the scumbag he is. Con's: 1) They lacked a coherent strategy. This is a government, at some point you have to reach a compromise with the other party. They had no way of forcing a compromise. Naturally, Obama and Reid will not easily compromise. 2) They got blamed for most of the problems of the shut down, imo. Obama was an ass-hole about the War Memorials and Cemeteries, but overall, the Conservatives took most of the blame for it. 3) Any hint of working together, party to party, evaporated immediately. Overall, it was an unwise move by the Conservatives. You don't start walking until you have decided where you're going, and how you're going to get there. The whole exercise reminded me of the WWII FIRST amphibious landing in the north of France, at Dieppe. It was a complete disaster. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
|
Amen to that.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() Talk nerdy to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
Crap. I was expecting fireworks and stuff at midnight. This was the most boring government shutdown EVER!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
I don't see how this has exposed Obama as anything but an embattled president being held to ransom by unreasonable opposition.
Ordinary, mainstream conservatives must be so sick of this stuff. How can they fly the flag of fiscal competency with this sort of shit coming from their ranks? The damage the Tea Party Republicans have done to America's standing in the world is profound. No matter what else, America's status as an economic powerhouse has never been more under threat. Having heard the same people rail against Obama for making America 'look weak' to her enemies by, for example, talking to Iran, it is surreal to me that they would voluntarily make their country look like it's a borderline failed state. The time for arguments and compromises was during the debates leading up to the passing of the budget and the passing of the Affordable Care Act. democrats compromised heavily. They all but compromised away most of the useful features of that act and pretty much gave the republicans the budget they asked for. For the Republicans to then balk at paying the bills or enacting that compromise was absurd.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Lecturer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
Not stick it to the people he's supposed to be serving! Going to extra expense to close the open air memorials in Washington (WWII, Lincoln, MLKing, and Vietnam), and the memorial cemeteries in France (most notably around Normandy Beaches). That cemented Obama as an ass-wipe forever. Obama had ALL the cards here: 1) Dominant party in the Senate, and a strong minority even in the House. The Democrats are all united, as well, whereas the Republicans are split moderates and very conservative. 2) ACA/Obamacare was already law. There is no way the funding can not go through, regardless of what the Conservatives in the House or Senate, do. It's too late for that. All Obama had to do was have a conference with the Conservatives, and make some slight compromises. Not to cut Obamacare, of course, that was never possible, just find something to give up as a symbol of the give and take politicians make to each other, all the time. I'm not saying it was his duty to do it, but it would have been a great sign of working together, to keep the gov't running, and our two parties being civil to one another. The substance could be quite small. It's all about saving face, showing a bit of respect for the opposition party, and everyone goes home a winner. Instead, Obama saw a chance to win win win, playing political gamesmanship. I'm not saying that the Republicans didn't start the game, but clearly it was an error, and it SCREAMED for a victor to be magnanimous in his triumph. But Obama would rather barricade off the WWII Memorial, so the 80 year old "Honor Flight" vets from the Midwest, can't get in to see it before they die. These are all WWII vets, for Christ's sake! And that memorial belongs to the PEOPLE, the gov't just has custodial care. Quote:
The focus was on Obamacare - which is already law, and they can't get enough votes to repeal it. So what's the sense in fighting against it? Not much! Not that I can see. That's why Obama had them where he couldn't lose. Just no way. That's where a really good president would have gone into conference with the Conservatives, and worked out a quick compromise to keep the gov't running normally. Instead, he has the NIH drug trials refuse to register new (terminal) cancer victims, into it's trials.They can't register (put a name and data into the computer), to save lives?? The doctors are there working, the nurses are there working, the trials are still on-going and new ones being started, but they can't REGISTER a new patient now? That's SOO scummy. I feel dirty just entering this into a reply. ![]() But this was the dumbest political maneuver I've seen in a long time, for sure. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
You've also motivated this independent voter to rearrange who he'd vote for and that harms the GOP unless I see the moderates push back. I don't like Obama even a little after the NSA revelations, continued CIA nonsense in the Middle-East, and ongoing drone attacks but no way does he share fault on this one. Congress had already passed compromise legislation and one unhappy little group of douche-bags tried an end run around the system because they didn't like the compromises that earned the votes.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|