Fat chicks get laid more

[jinx]

Not all at once.

Oh. Nevermind then.

[lumberjim]

good thing you're not a fat chick....I'd be too worried to leave you home alone.

[Aliantha]

Originally Posted by lumberjim

good thing you're not a fat chick....I'd be too worried to leave you home alone.

I can understand that being a concern Jimbo. Dazza makes sure my belt's done up nice and tight every day before he leaves.

[Cicero]

I don't believe any of this crap. All it says is fat women are less likely to be virgins. I think it's horse-puckey myself. They are saying that most virgins weigh a normal weight. I don't believe this stuff, so it don' matter.


Fat chicks are like, slutty. lol!


Aaah- I don't trust their stats. Really. Maybe skinny women lie more.

[monster]

Originally Posted by Cicero

Maybe skinny women lie more.

well they certainly lie alone more

[ZenGum]

Maybe they lied about being skinny too!

[Juniper]

Ugly fat guys can have ego issues, too. Many of them seem to be delusional.

I ended up with the in-between, and so did my hubster.

[Shawnee123]

I thought there'd be an application, or a sign-in sheet, or something...

[skysidhe]

When I was young all the sluts were the skinny ones.

In my youth I had no moral high ground although not a slut. I was a very sensory/physical person if attracted but I have more morals now that I am chubby and old.

[Aliantha]

I don't think that just because you happen to get laid more often makes you a slut.

I'm always amazed at people's colloquial attitudes to sex even in these days of enlightenment.

Once again, girls who have too many partners are sluts. Blokes who have a lot of partners are studs.

[Shawnee123]

Great point, Ali.

I wonder if it will ever change. I mean, will we ever get to think of men as back alley sluts?

Still, I'm waiting for the sign-in sheet.

[Aliantha]

Well I've known a couple of men who I've described as man whore. Interestingly enough, they laughed when I said it...which was good because that was the intention.

I think that's the point though. You can all sit around and have a joke about a mans latest conquest, but with women, you keep it to the girls and don't tell the blokes.

Didn't Sex and the City do anything for us???

[Perry Winkle]

Originally Posted by Aliantha

Didn't Sex and the City do anything for us???

It taught us that stories about rich, shallow, materialistic women aren't interesting?

I speak from only ever having seen the movie. I hear the TV series was less disgusting.

[Shawnee123]

Exactly: men are proud to be man-sluts!

[Sundae]

I made it through Sex and the City about four times. But I only reached that milestone by watching a couple of episode and then stitching together clips. No, it taught me nothing except that young, rich, attractive, well-dressed women in New York have sex. At a time that younger, poor, less attractive, far less well-dressed women in London only occasionally got it. For us it was the eternal tightrope of one night stand/ clinging man. Will he phone/ won't he. Do I want him to/ don't I? Should I/ shouldn't I? Men do/ can I?

None of us were size zero, able to afford to live on our own, able to afford the clothes we wanted (if we wanted - I would have preferred a car) or to go out more than twice a month - except to the pub. We didn't lunch, meet "eligible" males or complain about lack of commitment.

I hate Sex and the City. All it did was put the female ideal further out of a normal woman's reach. Any woman can keep her legs shut ('50s ideal), any woman can laugh and spread then ('60s ideal) and any woman can pogo '70s). Everything since then I'm baffled by.