The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2008, 12:47 AM   #1
Aliantha
trying hard to be a better person
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
Well you probably need less people involved in their own life and greed and more interested in their community if you want more people to volunteer.

Personally, I think those days are over. At least the days when a large percentage of people considered it a duty or part of their lives once they retired or found themselves in a financially stable position. These days, people think about travelling and doing things for themselves when they retire etc. Not their community.

Yeah yeah I know there are still some about who fit the old mold, but nowhere near the number there used to be. I know my family has always been involved in programs like 'meals on wheels' and 'homecare' etc, and those of my aunts and uncles who volunteer are always saying how there's just not the number of people helping out that there used to be.

It's a sad reflection of society and where we're headed. Unfortunately, it's also a true one.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber
Aliantha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 04:08 AM   #2
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
It's also worth taking into account that of the x% fraud, a large chunk of that will be extremely minor. People claiming unemployment/disability and also doing a little cash in hand work a few times a year. I honestly don't have a problem with that kind of low level scamming of the system...a few extra ££s in the hands of some single mum who is struggling bothers me a whole heap less than the millions (billions now) that we as tax payers have given to the wealthy.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 07:07 AM   #3
Trilby
Slattern of the Swail
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
...a few extra ££s in the hands of some single mum who is struggling bothers me a whole heap less than the millions (billions now) that we as tax payers have given to the wealthy.
I, uh, I agree. With Dana! I agree with Dana!
__________________
In Barrie's play and novel, the roles of fairies are brief: they are allies to the Lost Boys, the source of fairy dust and ...They are portrayed as dangerous, whimsical and extremely clever but quite hedonistic.

"Shall I give you a kiss?" Peter asked and, jerking an acorn button off his coat, solemnly presented it to her.
—James Barrie


Wimminfolk they be tricksy. - ZenGum
Trilby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 07:41 AM   #4
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianna View Post
I, uh, I agree. With Dana! I agree with Dana!

lol bloody hell, someone grab a calendar and mark this momentous event :P
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 07:49 AM   #5
lumberjim
I can hear my ears
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
It's also worth taking into account that of the x% fraud, a large chunk of that will be extremely minor. People claiming unemployment/disability and also doing a little cash in hand work a few times a year. I honestly don't have a problem with that kind of low level scamming of the system...a few extra ££s in the hands of some single mum who is struggling bothers me a whole heap less than the millions (billions now) that we as tax payers have given to the wealthy.
I admit, I don't know the first thing about how things work on YOUR Island, but I wonder if your phraseology is accurate. You say 'tax payers have given to the wealthy.' Would it be more accurate to say 'millions of their earnings that you've allowed them to keep'?
__________________
This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality
Embrace this moment, remember
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan
lumberjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:34 AM   #6
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
It's also worth taking into account that of the x% fraud, a large chunk of that will be extremely minor.

Even at 10% I don't find that dollar amount to minor. Maybe the UK's burden as a percentage of the total tax amount is smaller, but I am pretty sure Calif has a budget larger than the UK. So no, it is not an "extremely minor" amount of money.

Quote:
Classicman's quote:

If you take into consideration that the Fed receives about 3.5 trillion in tax revenues a year then 2.34 trillion dollars goes into social assistance programs. (2,340,000,000,000 dollars) if only lets say that on the low end 10% of the total is fraudulent or misused then that is 234 billion dollars that is being stolen from the countries tax payers.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 03:37 AM   #7
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Even at 10% I don't find that dollar amount to minor. Maybe the UK's burden as a percentage of the total tax amount is smaller, but I am pretty sure Calif has a budget larger than the UK. So no, it is not an "extremely minor" amount of money.

You misunderstand me Merc: I wasn't suggesting that fraud accounts for a 'minor' amount of money; I was suggesting that of the amount we lose to fraud, a large percentage of that will be made up of a lot of minor acts frauds for minor amounts of money. The vast majority of those who fiddle the system do not do so for great amounts of money. There will be a few hardcore people who take a lot out of the system, but the majority of fraud is the kind I've already mentioned: people claiming unemployment whilst sneakily doing a few hours of cash-in-hand work.

Like I said before: I find it difficult to begrudge that extra £30 a week (or whatever) to some parent who is struggling to get Christmas pressies for their kids, or new school shoes. Unfortunately, these small-scale frauds are the ones that are chased most. Because their combined weight is so heavy, and because casual workers are easy to spot (investigators traul the 'hotspots' like building sites, bars and market stalls, particularly at this time of year) they are caught and punished.

Personally, I'd leave those alone and focus on the ones who are really taking the piss. There are people out there claiming every possible benefit; lying to the authorities about their partner living with them, when their partner earns more than the fraud investigators. Families living quite well thankyou very much and still claiming all the benefits they can. They're much harder to catch, requiring stakeouts and full-on investigations. So we focus most heavily on the small fry.

What I wold like to see is a moritorium on prosecutions for those taking on Christmas work. Those jobs are rarely anything more than a few weeks' work. The money they earn will go back into the economy: the poor don't save, they spend. At present, if someone is claiming benefits they can take on up to 16 hours a week of work without losing those benefits...but their benefit is reduced accordingly: they are allowed to keep £10 of what they earn over and above their benefits each week. We should be letting them keep a higher amount. If people could legitimately claim benefits and also earn, say £30 a week above their benefits, more people would end up in legitimate (and protected) part-time employment, which may well be a stepping stone to more permanent or full-time work.

As it is, in order to survive and give their families a decent life, many are trapped into illegal and unstable part-time work, dictated by how willing thir employer is to conspire in their fraud.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:13 PM   #8
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
You misunderstand me Merc: I wasn't suggesting that fraud accounts for a 'minor' amount of money; I was suggesting that of the amount we lose to fraud, a large percentage of that will be made up of a lot of minor acts frauds for minor amounts of money. The vast majority of those who fiddle the system do not do so for great amounts of money. There will be a few hardcore people who take a lot out of the system, but the majority of fraud is the kind I've already mentioned: people claiming unemployment whilst sneakily doing a few hours of cash-in-hand work.
Ok, I understand now and generally agree with this assessment. Thanks.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 08:01 AM   #9
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Personally, I hadn't thought of it that way, but that is probably an accurate statement.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 08:16 AM   #10
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
I was referring to the rescue packages for banks etc.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 08:25 AM   #11
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
Quote:
"All my pals are looking for work as well. But it's not that easy to get a job straightaway, you've got to write out your CV and everything and then hand it in to places."
Ah...she needs to join The Cellar, and have you lot walk her through the process (like you did with me). Thanks, again! Loving my new job.
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:37 AM   #12
Pie
Gone and done
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,808
Flint, the Cellar is a helpful place, no doubt.

But you wanted that job, and you looked for resources to help you get it. You interviewed for it, and hit it out of the park.

The resources are almost always available to those who are willing & able to make the effort to look for them.
__________________
per·son \ˈpər-sən\ (noun) - an ephemeral collection of small, irrational decisions
The fun thing about evolution (and science in general) is that it happens whether you believe in it or not.
Pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:51 AM   #13
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
Shhh. he thinks he owes us, don't blow this.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 11:09 AM   #14
dar512
dar512 is now Pete Zicato
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 4,968
I agree that welfare should only be given to those who truly need it. I think it harms the recipient far more than it harms society as a whole.

On the other hand, don't count on fixing welfare to make a big dent in your tax dollars (in the US). Do a google search for "government spending pie chart" and/or "government spending welfare".

I found this interesting. I know they have a bias, but it's certainly not hidden. They also supply the sources for their figures.
__________________
"Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain."
-- Friedrich Schiller
dar512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 11:15 AM   #15
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
A giant drug-addicted alcoholic part-time blow-job giver for drugs and alcohol was worried that they were going to take away her welfare, or whatever it was. She was afraid she might have to look for a J-O-B. Someone asked her "when was the last time you worked?" She thought for a second and said "Nahnteen Sebenty Nahn."

Seriously.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.