The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Technology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2009, 10:12 AM   #16
Kaliayev
Magnificent Bastard
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 216
I use AVG and Clamwin, Spyware Terminator and Ad-Aware, and Comodo Firewall. I also use Firefox with NoScript. Between them, they seem to deal with almost every problem. I should look into anti-rootkit programs too, but I just haven't had the time yet.
Kaliayev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 10:23 AM   #17
mbpark
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 761
AVG 8 does both

AVG8 does both, which is why I am recommending it now instead of Avast! or AVG.

It works incredibly well. Running both AVAST! and AVG will kill machine performance.
mbpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 11:23 AM   #18
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Oh, I see.

Thanks for your help!
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 07:28 PM   #19
mbpark
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 761
And BTW,

Using more than 1 good AV or AS program is overkill and gives you little return. Using Firefox with NoScript gives you better protection than IE with a ton of AV/AS programs because the major root cause of infections is bad DLLs that run code as LocalSystem. Putting a ton of protection up via multiple AV/AS programs and using IE is like using a condom while putting holes in it.

You're not fixing the root cause of the issue, and you're making your system run like crap with mostly useless protection.

One good AV/AS program like AVG, Firefox, NoScript, FlashBlock, and keeping your products updated will make your system run well and well-protected.
mbpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 07:37 PM   #20
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbpark View Post
... and keeping your products updated will make your system run well and well-protected.
As I noted, if what I saw was a latest virus, then both Microsoft's Automatic Updates and the manual updates using www.windowsupdate.com do not work. If what I saw was a virus, then Microsoft's patches to avoid this latest malware do not get detected as missing and therefore do not get downloaded from Microsoft.

If Conflcker is as prevalent as predicted, then some here should have seen their anti-virus software detect it. As I understand from what is not being said, some anti-virus softwares do not detect or do not remove this widespread new worm.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 08:39 PM   #21
mbpark
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 761
TW, the latest MS patches guard against Conficker

TW,

The latest MS patches from January guard against Conficker.

Some AV programs do not detect it. I believe AVG does.
mbpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 09:36 PM   #22
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbpark View Post
The latest MS patches from January guard against Conficker.

Some AV programs do not detect it. I believe AVG does.
Conficker exists because some did not download the MS patches. The problem gets worse, as I understand it. The latest patches would not download if Conficker has already disabled Microsoft Automatic Updates, downloads using www.windowsupdate.com, and a few other Windows programs. A conundrum.

Apparently Microsoft's Malicious Software Removal tool and Symantec do detect Conficker. But that means the January version of the Malicious Software Removal tool must be downloaded manually from www.microsoft.com/downloads .

Above is what I have read; not confirmed. However this could be a benchmark for which anti-virus products are better.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 11:42 AM   #23
Radar
Constitutional Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
If you're going with a free product, I like Avast much better than AVG. If you're willing to cough up a few bucks, NOD32 and Kaspersky are the best.

Also make sure you've got Microsoft Defender installed and updated. Recently my mother got something pretty screwed up and I ended up installing a product a friend recommended called SuperAntiSpyware and it worked really well and detected and cleaned stuff that other products couldn't.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death."
- George Carlin
Radar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 11:55 AM   #24
mbpark
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 761
Microsoft Defender

Microsoft Defender, honestly, is not that good.

AVG, in my experience, has had the best track record at removing the really nasty viruses. I have used it to clean up things Symantec and Trend Micro (usually the gold standard) would not and could not clean up (AntiVirus 2008 Spyware/Malware). Avast! is a step behind.

I use it integrated with the Ultimate Boot CD on a USB stick to boot into with the latest definitions to clean up malware-laden machines, and it works really well. It will pick up things that other programs will not.

AVG 8.0 also has anti-spyware built in (it's nothing but additional definitions for a virus scanner when you get down to it), and that works incredibly well. Doing things such as having really long HOSTS files and a lot of manual ActiveX blocks actually causes your machine to run slowly (think several minutes for a DHCP lease).

Windows Defender, in my experience, has been pretty weak. If you want a free anti-spyware program that works, I recommend AVG, SuperANTISpyware, or Spybot. The latter two don't run in real-time (like AVG, McAfee, or other products), but they work well.

I outright recommend you run away from Webroot SpySweeper. It was good at one time, but is now a POS.
mbpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 12:21 PM   #25
Radar
Constitutional Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
As an IT Professional with over 20 years experience in the field, I can say without a doubt that Avast is better at getting rid of viruses and spyware than AVG. This isn't debatable, it's a fact.

Microsoft Defender is not a bad free product. Who knows better how your Microsoft system should run than Microsoft? That being said, it's also a free product, so they obviously aren't to spend a huge amount of time or money developing something that really cleans you up like SuperAntiSpyware.

I recommend you don't use AdAware.

Spybot is weak, but I do like the tool they include to edit your startup processes.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death."
- George Carlin
Radar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 12:22 PM   #26
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
the...

??
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 01:39 PM   #27
Radar
Constitutional Scholar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
Shawnee123. I'm not trying to come off like an arrogant douche or anything. I've just tested both products and I'm speaking from experience. If you don't believe what I'm saying google "avast vs avg" and read what people say.

Avast has boot time scans, scans in the background when the screensaver is running, is better at detecting and removing trojans, has several small updates per day rather than one huge one every week, etc.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death."
- George Carlin
Radar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 02:01 PM   #28
mbpark
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 761
Obligatory ISCA Labs Link

Radar,

http://www.icsalabs.com/icsa/topic.php?tid=b220$1ba2cc09-52eb29d6$8979-a7f252c0

http://www.icsalabs.com/icsa/product.php?tid=dfgdf$gdhkkjk-kkkk

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...se_2008_11.php

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...se_2008_08.php

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...se_2008_02.php

Both products are listed here. Both will work, and it's a trade-off depending on what reviews that you read. The reason I recommend AVG is because it does both and because I have seen it find and remove things that Symantec, Trend, and other products won't. Think very specific, targeted malware.

I also, when I find an infected machine, power it off and use Ultimate Boot CD with no networking on a USB stick to scan it so that I can get the machine in a state where I can scan it using a known good OS (I use a signed ISO downloaded from Microsoft's Volume Licensing Site), drivers, and anti-virus, and where I can scan and check for malware without using a compromised OS.

AVG actually publishes Plug-ins for their full version for the Ultimate Boot CD. Avast! only publishes a little "virus cleaner" like McAfee does for the Ultimate Boot CD/BartPE. Spybot Search & Destroy has a full version, as does SuperAntiSpyware. Their little "startup" tool works with BartPE/UBCD installations too.

Maybe if Avast! did what AVG does for those of us who scan infected machines that way, I'd be as bombastic in supporting them as you .

It's been quite obvious from the torrents of malware out there that Microsoft has had major issues with security over the past few years. I wouldn't trust an AV or AS product from them because it's not fixing the underlying issues causing the infections in the first place. Vista/Windows 7 and IE 7/8 are good first steps, but nowhere near where Linux or FreeBSD are at this point (Mac OS X has the same issues, too).
mbpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 02:04 PM   #29
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radar View Post
Shawnee123. I'm not trying to come off like an arrogant douche or anything. I've just tested both products and I'm speaking from experience. If you don't believe what I'm saying google "avast vs avg" and read what people say.

Avast has boot time scans, scans in the background when the screensaver is running, is better at detecting and removing trojans, has several small updates per day rather than one huge one every week, etc.
Oh I didn't think you were. When I first read your post it stopped at "the" and was unfinished. I wondered what came next. It said "but I do like the" and stopped. You never got to "tool..."

I appreciate all the advice and opinions.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 12:05 AM   #30
Nirvana
Back in 10
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,684
I have AVG, SuperAnti Spyware, Spybot, Malwarebytes, Crap Cleaner and they work very well with each other and together they catch everything and they are free!
__________________
Speaking simply... do not confuse this with having a simple mind.
Nirvana is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.