The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-16-2009, 05:04 PM   #1
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
And there are people here (mostly on the right) who are trying to block the closing of Guantanamo.
Completely UNTRUE! Cite or retract. Have you read about all the conversations and negotiations that went on since 2004 about trying to secure the release of any of these people?

C'mon - you gotta stop spewing this crap. opinion is one thing, but to just make false claims without cites is and purport them as facts makes you no better than ...
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 10:39 PM   #2
Glinda
Fucktard Resistance League
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 1.14 acres of heaven
Posts: 1,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
Dana, it's because the right has people all up in a stir about releasing them HERE. And now democrats are also being stupid. Which I find hysterical. WE don't want to take any of them, but we expect others to. We don't even want to try them here and put them in prison here, because, you know, we don't have any prisons capable of holding them. It's absurd. But they have to go somewhere. And there are people here (mostly on the right) who are trying to block the closing of Guantanamo. So he is trying to get the ones out who have been cleared of any crimes.

I never ceases to amaze me, how we just expect others to clean up our mess.
I don't know why we just don't ship them to Hardin, Montana. The folks there want them, and knowing the craziness of many Montanans, if any of the "detainees" () tried to escape, they'd be dead in a New York minute.

I don't see a downside.
Glinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 12:44 AM   #3
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Cuba or Hardin, they'd still be illegally detained.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 08:40 AM   #4
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Cuba or Hardin, they'd still be illegally detained.
No need to worry. Obama promised to close Gitmo by Dec. He still has 5 months to do what he promised.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 12:19 PM   #5
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Cuba or Hardin, they'd still be illegally detained.
Not if they are charged and awaiting trial, or convicted of a crime.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 05:18 PM   #6
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
I watched the hearings the other day where they were trying to do it. They didn't get enough votes. If you want to see, go to CSPAN.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:31 PM   #7
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
I watched the hearings the other day where they were trying to do it. They didn't get enough votes. If you want to see, go to CSPAN.
And please stop accusing me of posting stuff that isn't true. YOU are the one jumping the gun here. Just because you didn't hear about it doesn't mean it didn't happen classic.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 06:08 PM   #8
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Oh Sugar, I'm happy that those men have been taken in by Bermuda. I really am. I'd have been all in favour of that *smiles* I'd have been in favour of them coming here if necessary. Like I say...it's the slap in the face of British sovereignty by America that's the cheeky bit :P
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:34 PM   #9
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Oh Sugar, I'm happy that those men have been taken in by Bermuda. I really am. I'd have been all in favour of that *smiles* I'd have been in favour of them coming here if necessary. Like I say...it's the slap in the face of British sovereignty by America that's the cheeky bit :P
Obama is doing quite a few things that I'm not happy with. I understand why he did it though, considering the insanity and irrationality he's dealing with here at home about detainees being released.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:40 PM   #10
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
I don't understand why he did it. There is no reason that isn't profoundly insulting and/or patronising. It was deliberately kept secret from the British government until the very end. To suggest that this was to protect us from China's strongarm tactics is basically to suggest that we are not a nation on our own feet able to make decisions about our own sovereign territories.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:51 PM   #11
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
It was kept secret from the government? How in the hell did he accomplish that?

yea, I would be deeply insulted as well. Just because he is being reamed here at home is no reason to treat our allies that way. I apologize. I was wrong to sympathize with his actions.

He needs to start pushing back hard against the assholes who refuse to cooperate with him on anything he is trying to do. Republican, the new party of NO. Funny how they never said no when it was their own party in power. That is one thing I really have against them. At least when they're in power democrats work with them on some things. They aren 't willing to give in on anything. Well, except for the 2 senators from Maine, and the one who switched parties and is now a democrat.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 09:09 PM   #12
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
It was kept secret from the government? How in the hell did he accomplish that?

yea, I would be deeply insulted as well. Just because he is being reamed here at home is no reason to treat our allies that way. I apologize. I was wrong to sympathize with his actions.

Thankyou. I am glad someone at least sees why that might be a problem lol.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:37 PM   #13
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
It was not Obama's fault nor his responsibility to tell the Brits - That lied solely upon Bermuda. Bermuda, IN FACT, did notify the Brits, just not as soon as they would have liked. That was reported last week in an interview with Bermuda Premier Ewart Brown.
Quote:
Brown said he had no security concerns because the men were cleared by U.S. courts. But Britain, which handles Bermuda's defense, security and foreign affairs, expressed displeasure at the deal.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:40 PM   #14
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Now a senior US official has told the BBC it was a deliberate decision not to consult London on the resettlement, after other countries came under pressure from China not to accept the Uighurs.

What Brown is doing, is facesaving...because he needs to...because this was a slap in the face. Brown is a Prime Minister embattled. He has lost the respect and regard of his own party let alone the opposition. He looks impotent. So...of course he is trying to make it look like he was in on it. And...frankly its easier to show displeasure at Bermuda than the States.

Britain was informed, after the negotiations and decision had been taken. Literally just before the men boarded the plane. It was a fait accomplis.

There is no way of looking at this that isnt insulting.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:53 PM   #15
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
It was still Bermuda's responsibility, not the US's.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.