The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Cities and Travel
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Cities and Travel Tell us about where you are; tell us about where you want to be

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2010, 07:44 AM   #16
Madman
has left the building.
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 455
No. Fat people are still one (1) person. They purchase a ticket for one (1) person. Personally, I'd like to see a class action lawsuit suing the shit out of every single airline on the planet that condone this type of greedy bullshit.

They already have us squeezed in like sardines. I'm 6'4, 225 lbs. I always fly coach, take an isle seat and sit with my legs in the isle. I'd like to see them try to make me buy two tickets because I'm too tall. There'd be a lawsuit slapped on their ass faster than they could say "we'll settle out of court."

No, no, no, no and no. Fat people are still one (1) person.
.......................................................

Just like charging $20.00 a bag. That just reeks of greed. The only smart one out there that I know of is Southwest Airlines.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 07:51 AM   #17
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madman View Post
They already have us squeezed in like sardines. I'm 6'4
Only the tall and fat people are squeezed in like sardines. Short skinny people have plenty of room. It's simple geometry.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 08:37 AM   #18
SamIam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
Maybe we should just send children on business trips.
SamIam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 08:37 AM   #19
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madman
They already have us squeezed in like sardines.
They are more than capable of ordering planes from Boeing with fewer and larger seats installed. But then, the tickets would cost more, and we'd all just be subsidizing the people who would have needed two seats. Buy one (1) first-class ticket if you're that big.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madman
The only smart one out there that I know of is Southwest Airlines.
They run their business well, to be sure. But you'd better believe their coach seats are just as small as the rest.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:28 AM   #20
Madman
has left the building.
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 455
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
Only the tall and fat people are squeezed in like sardines. Short skinny people have plenty of room. It's simple geometry.
Braggart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
They are more than capable of ordering planes from Boeing with fewer and larger seats installed. But then, the tickets would cost more, and we'd all just be subsidizing the people who would have needed two seats. Buy one (1) first-class ticket if you're that big.

They run their business well, to be sure. But you'd better believe their coach seats are just as small as the rest.
First class is expensive. I flew my mother first class about three years ago to visit her grand daughter. I paid just over $900 for first class in a 3-hour flight. It would've cost $300 for coach. And they still only gave her a bag of peanuts and a soda - just like coach. All she got was a bigger seat for $600 more bucks.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:36 AM   #21
monster
I hear them call the tide
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perpetual Chaos
Posts: 30,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by toranokaze View Post
You're wrong there should be a fairy tax
poofterist.
__________________
The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart
monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:42 AM   #22
monster
I hear them call the tide
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perpetual Chaos
Posts: 30,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
They are more than capable of ordering planes from Boeing with fewer and larger seats installed. But then, the tickets would cost more, and we'd all just be subsidizing the people who would have needed two seats. Buy one (1) first-class ticket if you're that big.
Why can't they build planes with a couple of rows of "husky" seats -4 seats in place of 5, 4 rows instead of 5 -16 seats instead of 25, travellers pay$480 instead of $300, travellers who can't fit in a regular seat must pay for one of these.

Same as clothes. You need bigger clothes, it uses more cloth, costs more money. No amount of fairness is going to squeeze Big Brenda into a size 2.
__________________
The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart
monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:55 AM   #23
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Makes sense to have that option. It seems silly to have only first class as the option available to bigger people. Apart from anything else, the number of people who would use/need that option is growing (no pun intended) so the airlines are missing a trick: pissing off a significant proportion of their prospective customer base.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 09:56 AM   #24
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by monster View Post
Why can't they build planes with a couple of rows of "husky" seats -4 seats in place of 5, 4 rows instead of 5 -16 seats instead of 25, travellers pay$480 instead of $300, travellers who can't fit in a regular seat must pay for one of these.
Don't they already do that, and call it first class, and charge 5 times the coach rate?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:13 AM   #25
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by monster
Why can't they build planes with a couple of rows of "husky" seats -4 seats in place of 5, 4 rows instead of 5 -16 seats instead of 25, travellers pay$480 instead of $300, travellers who can't fit in a regular seat must pay for one of these.

Same as clothes. You need bigger clothes, it uses more cloth, costs more money. No amount of fairness is going to squeeze Big Brenda into a size 2.
Like glatt said, they do that and they call it first class. The problem is your 4-to-5 switch doesn't really do much: an airline seat is maybe 18 inches across? So in a more spacious row of 4 seats, each seat is only getting an extra 4 inches. That's not gonna help Tubby McLardass a whole bunch. Same with the extra space in the front, it's only going to be a few inches.

First class generally has 3 rows 4 seats across, where in coach they could have fit 5 rows 6 across. So you've gone from 30 seats to 12, and not surprisingly, they charge somewhere between 2 and 3 times the price depending on the demand in that flight for the first class seats. Seems perfectly fair to me.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:23 AM   #26
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
Only the tall and fat people are squeezed in like sardines. Short skinny people have plenty of room. It's simple geometry.
I don't have plenty of room, I feel totally squeezed in, I don't know how people any larger can stand it.
If it weren't so awful to fly, I might do it more often.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:29 AM   #27
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
You could always fly JetBlue. Of course, like everything better, it's also more expensive.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 11:58 AM   #28
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
I'm getting Deja Vu reading this . . . Did we already do this somewhere?

For the record - I agree that if you are taking up space equal to 2 seats (for whatever reason) then you should pay for both. If you stick out like the guy in the pic from the original post - You shouldn't be there at all. Take a barge or something. Thats past inconvenience, thats outright dangerous.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 12:40 PM   #29
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinx View Post
I don't have plenty of room, I feel totally squeezed in, I don't know how people any larger can stand it.
That's kinda my point. Short small people have absolutely no idea how good they have it.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 12:47 PM   #30
Pico and ME
Are you knock-kneed?
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middle Hoosierland
Posts: 3,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinx View Post
I don't have plenty of room, I feel totally squeezed in, I don't know how people any larger can stand it.
If it weren't so awful to fly, I might do it more often.
I agree. The last time I flew the seat rows were so close together that I could not lean over enough to reach for my purse on the floor. I had to hook it with my foot and bring it up to my hand. Im 5ft and 110 pounds.
Pico and ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.