one more day

[lisa]

Hey, I concede! I make no claims to "legend". The claim was "thrust upon me"... so to speak.

As for the "girl sandwich," the comment was made that you just want to be "the middle of a girl sandwich" which meant the girls are on the outside. So there! :P

<giggle> Yeah, I get too technical sometimes, but I just mention the thoughts as they occur to me. I don't mean to seriously question anyone -- just consider them "ramblings of a demented, twisted, but still, in some strange way, logical mind."

[MaggieL]

Originally posted by BrianR
Put a strap-on onto Maggie and she can be a reasonable facsimilie...

Strap on? Hmmm. I think I'd prefer my double-header.

From Kate Bornstien's "Gender Outlaw":
<blockquote>
I remeber one time at a gay and lesbian writer's conference in San Francisco, I was on a panel and asking these same questions [rhetorical questions about the nature of gender and sexuality]. Because it was a specifically gay and lesbian audience, an audiance that defined itself by its sexual orientation, I wanted to tweak them on that identity. I asked "And what if I strapped on a dildo and made love to you: what would that make me?" Without missing a beat, panelist Carol Queen piped up,"Nostalgic."
</blockquote>

BTW, I think it may be illegal for Jag (who is *way* underage) to read this thread in Australia.

Lisa: First it was pelting, now thrusting. :-)

[jaguar]

a: Its not illegal
b: I'm not underage in the sense that you mean.
ie: i'm 16 therefore under aust law i can fuck whoever i want.

[elSicomoro]

Originally posted by jaguar
a: Its not illegal
b: I'm not underage in the sense that you mean.
ie: i'm 16 therefore under aust law i can fuck whoever i want.

Certainly, you can read this...given that it would be covered under free speech here...I think.

The age of consent varies by state here in the US. I believe it is 17 here in the Commonwealth of PA. Most states it's 16 or 17. Of course, in my native state of Missouri, it was actually DROPPED to 15, last I remember...*insert trailer trash/barefoot and pregnant/inbreeding remark here*

[MaggieL]

I'm not speaking about "age of consent"...

Originally posted by jaguar
a: Its not illegal
b: I'm not underage in the sense that you mean.

"An ABA declaration setting out minimum system requirements for restricted access systems was tabled in Parliament on 7 December 1999.

"Restricted access systems are adult verification devices that allow only people who are 18 years or older to access adult material on the Internet. Restricted access systems protect children from exposure to material that may be unsuitable for them.

"The declaration sets out the process by which a person can gain access to Internet content that is likely to be rated 'R' by the Classification Board. It relies on credit card validation as a means to check that a person is 18 years or older.

"Internet content hosted in Australia that is likely to be classified 'R' and not protected by a compliant restricted access system is potentially prohibited content. If the ABA receives a complaint about that content after 1 January 2000, it may direct the relevant Internet content host to remove that material from its service."

--from http://www.aba.gov.au/internet/regul...ted_access.htm

"Does the Australian law apply to content outside Australia?

"Yes, but only content that is complained about to the ABA and that in the ABA's opinion is prohibited content, that is, content that is or would be classified X or NVE or Refused Classification. (The ABA is not required to obtain a classification from the OFLC for content outside Australia.)

"Content that is or would be classified R and that is hosted outside Australia is not covered by the law at all."

-from http://libertus.net/liberty/faq_auscens1.html#oscontent

So....if The Cellar were hosted in .au, we'd all have to avoid being "R" rated until an age-fliter that kept under-18s out was implemented. As it is, we're OK as long as we're only "R " ...and nobody in .au complains. :-) If they did, and we were found to be worse than R, we could be filtered out.

The problem with satin sheets is mostly for guys who have traction problems on a low-friction surface. I'd recommend hooking toes somewhere between the mattress and the footboard. Waterbeds can be helpful in this circumstance; rather like getting your foot under the gunwale of an inflatable raft when going whitewater.

and the thread careens out of control.....

[MaggieL]

Originally posted by dhamsaic
and the thread careens out of control.....

It doesn't take much to draw a crowd around here...

[jaguar]

In other words - the laws are paper tigers to keep hte ultraconcervative luddites at bay.

[BrianR]

Leave commences at 1600 (4pm for civilians).

I'll be on the road before that though. I'l just call in my start time.

I can hardly wait...I need a break.

Brian