Here's What's Wrong with Science... - Page 3

Lamplighter · 01-01-2014, 12:13 PM

Oooops...

But even so I'd be interested your reactions

Clodfobble · 01-01-2014, 11:24 PM

It was interesting. I didn't see a description of the actual process eLife uses for submissions and review, but I am in favor of keeping things open-source in general. Transparent is always better.

Molasar · 01-04-2014, 05:47 PM

of course the problem of 'peer-review' or validation of a hypothesis or reproducing the same results before publication is that if it isn't published then peers can't run with it - cf. chicken and egg scenario.

01-01-2014, 11:24 PM	#32
Clodfobble UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 20,012	It was interesting. I didn't see a description of the actual process eLife uses for submissions and review, but I am in favor of keeping things open-source in general. Transparent is always better. __________________ My book My other book My spirit animal

01-04-2014, 05:47 PM	#33
Molasar Part-time superhero (off shift right now, leave a message) Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Her Majesty's United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Posts: 211	of course the problem of 'peer-review' or validation of a hypothesis or reproducing the same results before publication is that if it isn't published then peers can't run with it - cf. chicken and egg scenario. __________________ The only dumb question is the one you didn't ask.

01-01-2014, 12:13 PM	#31
Lamplighter Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods Posts: 6,402	Oooops... But even so I'd be interested your reactions

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)