The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2007, 07:23 AM   #1
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
It occurred to me tonight to wonder where Iran was getting its uranium, and Google came to my aid. The Iranians seem to be working any source they can get at; they're mining some modest reserves of rather low grade ore domestically and they're working on African sources, showing a good deal of enthusiasm for mines in Somalia -- though how much success they'd have, fishing in waters this troubled, I'm sure I don't know. Then there's the Tanzanian uranium smuggling incident, where a lot of stuff doesn't quite add up yet -- arguments, for example, over just how much radioactivity could have been detectable in and from the shipping container. The UN report on all this for some reason (possibly skanky, as UN corruption and favoritism are becoming better and better known) isn't talking about uranium, while Tanzanian officialdom is. Sounds like you ought to fly to Dar Es Salaam with your own Geiger counter and geologists' hammer and find out for yourself. I didn't even see anything on whether it was raw ore or yellowcake, but I might have missed something.

Domestic Iranian Uranium -- I'm a poet and I don't know it.

Two Iranians prospecting for uranium possibilities in Somalia -- link to a one-sentence mention included in a UN report detailing arms smuggling into Somalia in aid of both the Transitional Government and the Islamic Courts.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.

Last edited by Urbane Guerrilla; 01-23-2007 at 07:51 AM.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 01:59 PM   #2
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
There is a difference between that and talking about how a government supports terrorist.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 02:01 PM   #3
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
I know V for Vendetta used that but I'm sure they got it from somewhere else.

By the way, that quote was sarcasm, yet it is sadly true.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 09:10 PM   #4
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
What Phil said. "a people should not fear their government - a government should fear the people."
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 10:40 PM   #5
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesman065 View Post
What Phil said. "a people should not fear their government - a government should fear the people."
I'm pretty sure the American government doesn't fear it's people. Doesn't that make us back-assward?
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 07:47 AM   #6
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
I'm pretty sure the American government doesn't fear it's people. Doesn't that make us back-assward?
I think they fear us plenty. Why else would they be saying all they do to appease us. If at some point they didn't, they certainly do now. They need us to remain employed, to have the power we entrust them with.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:30 AM   #7
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesman065 View Post
I think they fear us plenty. Why else would they be saying all they do to appease us. If at some point they didn't, they certainly do now. They need us to remain employed, to have the power we entrust them with.
Are you talking about 500 or so elected people that are so entrenched in the political scum, you'd play hell trying to dispose of them? Or by government do you mean the millions that occupy those desks, or benchs, or trucks, or tanks, and you can't do a damn thing about?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 07:43 AM   #8
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Are you talking about 500 or so elected people that are so entrenched in the political scum, you'd play hell trying to dispose of them? Or by government do you mean the millions that occupy those desks, or benchs, or trucks, or tanks, and you can't do a damn thing about?
I was referring to the elected officials
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 12:44 AM   #9
Ibby
erika
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
If you think the government doesnt fear the people, just wait till election year rolls around. Fear of no votes (and therefore no JOB) is fear all the same, no?
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
Ibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 02:01 PM   #10
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Why would Bush send a "surge" of troops when no one wants that? They may give us an illusion that we have power when in reality, it is just one big cycle.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 02:21 PM   #11
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Why would Bush send a "surge" of troops when no one wants that?
Because he thinks the appearance of being a strong leader is as important if not more important than actually leading.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:08 PM   #12
Kitsune
still eats dirt
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Why would Bush send a "surge" of troops when no one wants that?
What, you think applying more force isn't going to make this better or something?
Kitsune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2007, 12:16 AM   #13
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Why would Bush send a "surge" of troops when no one wants that? They may give us an illusion that we have power when in reality, it is just one big cycle.
To steal the oil and natural gas, duh!
Time to make the move.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:00 PM   #14
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
nuclear Holocaust
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:11 PM   #15
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Everyone in the Mideast is counting on the soft Americans to fold up their tents and leave. Only problem is they are facing a President who will not fold - period. Just when it seems that everyone is saying quit - he steps it up. Then the insurgent violence goes up a notch too. All these Mid East wacko leaders suddenly start making statements to the world and on and on. . .
Hmm. Just an observation.

Last edited by yesman065; 01-24-2007 at 03:16 PM.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.