The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2009, 11:35 AM   #61
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Nope. The Second Amendment only applies to legal US citizens who follow the law as currently written. If you use your right as an excuse to violate other peoples right you just may lose it. Another purpose of government.
So what part of what the UCLA defended violated the law?
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 03:10 PM   #62
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
?
Attached Images
 
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 05:12 PM   #63
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griff View Post
?


I blame the drugs.
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 10:13 PM   #64
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGRR View Post

I blame the drugs.
I blame Bush.

Oopps, no that would be the job of the Demoncrats.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 01:09 PM   #65
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Nope. The Second Amendment only applies to legal US citizens who follow the law as currently written. If you use your right as an excuse to violate other peoples right you just may lose it. Another purpose of government.
I could make the exact same argument about the first ammendment. You are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 04:45 PM   #66
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
I could make the exact same argument about the first ammendment. You are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Nope. I just don't support those who support child molesters.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 08:00 PM   #67
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Nope. I just don't support those who support child molesters.
I don't support child molesters. I do support the first ammendment, as I support the second ammendment. Not everyone should be able to print whatever they want (child pornography), and not everyone should be allowed to own a gun (kids or mentally unstable people). You, on the other hand, are a hypocrite. I still love you though. *smooch*

Last edited by sugarpop; 02-24-2009 at 08:07 PM.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 09:24 PM   #68
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
I don't support child molesters. I do support the first ammendment, as I support the second ammendment. Not everyone should be able to print whatever they want (child pornography), and not everyone should be allowed to own a gun (kids or mentally unstable people). You, on the other hand, are a hypocrite. I still love you though. *smooch*
Check the laws, Mentally unstable people and kids are not allowed to own guns. Check your facts before you start throwing BS around. Mk.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 10:06 PM   #69
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Check the laws, Mentally unstable people and kids are not allowed to own guns. Check your facts before you start throwing BS around. Mk.
Really? Then why is the NRA so fucking opposed to trying to keep guns out of the hands of those people? And your arguments support that reasoning.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 10:08 PM   #70
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Great, show me the link where "the NRA so fucking opposed to trying to keep guns out of the hands of" mentally unstable people. As far as kids go, they should be oriented early to the proper use of guns, gun safety, and the laws that are on the books. Kids cannot buy guns legally in the US. They can and should be allowed to shoot them.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 10:11 PM   #71
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
The NRA is opposed to ANY kind of gun control. Even gun control that would have prevented certain obviously unstable (or underage) people from aquiring guns, who went on shooting sprees, killing and injuring lots of people.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 10:14 PM   #72
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarpop View Post
The NRA is opposed to ANY kind of gun control. Even gun control that would have prevented certain obviously unstable (or underage) people from aquiring guns, who went on shooting sprees, killing and injuring lots of people.
Actually that is somewhat wrong.

Well people aquire cars and drive and kill. Why don't we get rid of cars? Cars must be the problem. People have nothing to do with it. I think every time someone dies from lung cancer from smoking they should hunt down and kill one person who smokes. Because a shit load more of people die from smoking than from guns.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 11:36 AM   #73
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Driving cars requires licenses, and there are any number of government programs to discourage smoking.

I doubt the NRA would support gun licenses or anti-gun PSAs.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 06:58 PM   #74
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
Driving cars requires licenses, and there are any number of government programs to discourage smoking.

I doubt the NRA would support gun licenses or anti-gun PSAs.
Good for them.

Get your mitts off of my rights, please.
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.