The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2004, 02:05 PM   #91
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
It's about choices. There are tons of alternatives. Some are more feasable than others. Some are cheaper than others. Some are safer than others.

Jag's point is that of all the choices out there, shale oil is not a smart way to go. I have no knowledge of shale oil, so I won't weigh in on one side or the other of this argument, but Jag has made a pretty factual argument against the use of shale oil.

If you are going to attack him, attack his facts.

I personally am very interested in the chicken-guts-to-oil plants that Changing World Technologies already has up and running. If we can turn trash into oil as they claim, that would solve everything
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 03:01 PM   #92
jaguar
whig
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
while lookout looks for facts, refer to my little line of text.
I knew pre-emptive abuse would come in handy.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life.
- Twain
jaguar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 04:39 PM   #93
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here is a highly informative document put out, not by Michael Moore, nor by Rush Limbaugh, but by the United States Department of Energy:

http://www.fe.doe.gov/programs/reser...ificancev1.pdf

Among other things this document states that the US imports 60% of its liquid hydrocarbon needs (so much for that cute little chart being bandied about on this thread). The DOE projects that US imports may double by 2025 and that the vast majority of imports come from the OPEC nations. (big surprise!)

The DOE then goes on to discuss the impact of oil shortfalls on the US economy, citing the events which occurred in this country in the 70's due to the oil embargo put in place by the OPEC nations. The embargo drove oil prices sky high which led to high inflation, high unemployment, and high interest rates; all at the same time. The DOE states that America's vulnerability to oil price shocks has become even higher in the interim since the 70's.

Here's what I mean when I say its about oil, stupid; not 9/11. And I quote:


"The Department of Defense has a strategic requirement to maintain secure sources of liquid fuels to mobilize its aircraft, naval fleets, and land vehicles at home and around the
world. Heightened concerns over domestic security intensify the need for the military to
ensure that secure fuels are available to protect the Nation, to support U.S. forces positioned overseas, and to project force when it is deemed necessary to protect America’s strategic interests and global commitments. To support this strategic requirement, the military pre-positions fuel supplies in the United States and around the world. As these stocks are drawn down, the military purchases replacement
fuels from global markets. If replacement fuels are not available in a timely
manner, military capabilities are at least temporarily diminished. Domestic sources for
military fuels must be re-evaluated in the context of rising import dependencies and increasing vulnerability to supply interruptions. Of direct importance are:
Supplementing decreasing domestic production
Maintaining fuel performance for the legacy fleet
Keeping fuel costs as low as possible during peacetime to facilitate training."


AS far as oil fields replenishing themselves, I have my doubts, but lack the background in geology to make an intelligent reply. I do know that here in the West, water aquifers do not replenish themselves, and their is great concern as continued population growth depletes these precious water resources in the Western states. The DOE does not seem to have been let in on the secret of oil fields resupplying themselves, either. Here is their comment: "About 80 percent of the oil produced today flows from fields that were found before 1973, and the great majority of these are declining."

I am no fan of "the sky is falling" hysterics, myself, but I do believe in a reasoned consideration of a problem from best case to worst case scenario. It is foolish, as well as ignorent to ignore impending difficultities and sing ourselves to sleep with lullibies about how life is fair, and the family dog will never die and we'll never grow old and God will keep squirting petroleum into oil fields everywhere. The morning will come when we awake to discover the lines on our face, the dog dead and gone years ago, the bully across the street has just unfairly beat us up for about the 600th time, and when we crawl to our car to go to the emergency room, it has no gas.

And quite frankly, I could give a flying fuck whether the US remains a world "leader" or not. We are a big country with plenty of natural resources still, if only we would be good stewards of what we have been blessed with. The American people are good, hard working people and can take care of themselves. Let's become self sufficient again, have a military strong enough to protect our own borders without traipsing off to some third world hell hole, and let the rest of the world be damned.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 04:52 PM   #94
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Among other things this document states that the US imports 60% of its liquid hydrocarbon needs (so much for that cute little chart being bandied about on this thread).
Yes, and most of those imports are not from the Persian Gulf. The data for the chart also comes from the DOE by the way.

Quote:
DOD says oil is strategically important even to the military
DUH
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 04:56 PM   #95
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
And not all OPEC members are in the Persian Gulf either.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 04:59 PM   #96
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
Yes, and most of those imports are not from the Persian Gulf. The data for the chart also comes from the DOE by the way.

The document I referred to and quoted in my post stated:
"the vast majority of imports come from the OPEC nations."


Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
DUH
no comment
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 05:07 PM   #97
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
Yes, and most of those imports are not from the Persian Gulf. The data for the chart also comes from the DOE by the way.
Even if true, that is meaningless. Oil is only slightly less fungible than cash.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 05:34 PM   #98
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
http://api-ec.api.org/filelibrary/May03imp.pdf

Top ten US imports by country, Jan-May 2003:

Canada 16.9%
Saudi Arabia 16.2%
Mexico 13.2%
Venezuela 9.5%
Nigeria 6.9%
Iraq 5.0%
United Kingdom 3.7%
Angola 3.0%
Algeria 2.8%
Virgin Islands 2.1%

All OPEC countries 43.9%
All Persian Gulf countries 20.6%
Percent of consumed US oil from Persian Gulf (ie., percentage of both import and domestic oil): 14.0%
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 05:44 PM   #99
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
http://api-ec.api.org/filelibrary/May03imp.pdf

Top ten US imports by country, Jan-May 2003:

Canada 16.9%
Saudi Arabia 16.2%
Mexico 13.2%
Venezuela 9.5%
Nigeria 6.9%
Iraq 5.0%
United Kingdom 3.7%
Angola 3.0%
Algeria 2.8%
Virgin Islands 2.1%

All OPEC countries 43.9%
All Persian Gulf countries 20.6%
Percent of consumed US oil from Persian Gulf (ie., percentage of both import and domestic oil): 14.0%
Percentage of consumed US oil from Persian Gulf 14%, top US imports by country... Saudi Arabia 16.2% Well, that's interesting. Maybe someone should go back and teach the guys who wrote that one up a little bit of elementary math.:p
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 05:47 PM   #100
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
I was trying to puzzle that out myself. Anyway, what is the meaning of these statistics?
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 05:54 PM   #101
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
20.6 is the percentage of all US oil imports that come from the Persian Gulf

14.0 is the percentage of all US oil, imports AND domestic, that come from the Persian Gulf

We are addressing Mari's notion that this was a war about oil.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 06:46 PM   #102
bluesdave
Getting older every day
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
Meanwhile here is the guy who says oil is produced differently than the 200-year-old theory about it.
People tend to stick to beliefs that support their own comfort zones, and disregard anything that is contrary to those. You tend to gravitate towards people who also share your beliefs, and steer away from those who don't. Ten years ago many people (including some scientists), did not want to believe in global warming, and there were many books published, pushing the argument that global warming is a myth. Now we know it is a fact, and whilst there is still debate on to what degree we humans have impacted on it, there is general agreement that it is real.

There is no doubt that the world is using its natural resources at an alarming rate, and anyone who thinks they will last forever is just deluding themselves.
__________________
History is a great teacher; it is a shame that people never learn from it.
bluesdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:40 PM   #103
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
20.6 is the percentage of all US oil imports that come from the Persian Gulf

14.0 is the percentage of all US oil, imports AND domestic, that come from the Persian Gulf
Well, somebody somewhere is telling a whopping big lie. My figure of 60% came from an official DOE report. You'd think the boys in the government would at least get their stories straight. That to me is as suspicious as anything else. Go look at the site I posted above. They say 60%. I'm not making that up.

Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
We are addressing Mari's notion that this was a war about oil.
Silly me. How could I possibly make the connection between a military action in the Middle East and oil? We girls are just useless little bits of fluff!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 08:48 PM   #104
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
60% is the percentage of oil used by the US that is imported.

All the numbers fit together. Math is hard
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 09:06 PM   #105
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quick back to the Moore film - it turns out that he's pushing the theory that Afghanistan was all about an oil pipeline, the theory advanced by Ted Rall.

But I told you that was horseshit over a year ago
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.