Iran creates international panic

[classicman]

Personally, I like UT just the way he is. He's a very kind-hearted man who does a lot for others and has gone above and beyond several times to help me. He is well liked and well grounded. I don't think any epiphany is needed.

Dana, well I haven't had as much interaction with her, and although she and I disagree about many ... well most everything except poetry, I think shes a good egg too.

But thats just my opinion

[Undertoad]

For the record, why do you think you should ask me if I'm choosing between the two?

Because

Originally Posted by UG in #55

All you need do is continue removing any foes of libertarianism that present themselves. Whether by conversion or by gunfire,

Conversion or gunfire.

So why add epiphany to the list? Remember that the key question is

Originally Posted by UG in #46

If there is any wrongness in removing undemocracy and replacing it with democracy, absolutely no one has been able to explain it.

If you are adding epiphany, you might have found your own explanation. Is there something wrong with killing or converting Dana? You've never suggested so:

Originally Posted by UG in #40

Either kill undemocracy and end its evils and oppressions, or get the fuck off my Earth for being lacking in good qualities. Sounds binary of me, to be sure, but I accept a continuum in politics -- continua are the essence of politics anyway. Still, the good men uproot evils, and the bad men just leave them to thrive. Where do you stand?

If you're not killing or converting Dana, where do you stand?