![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
The only things there that the uber Right (as opposed to sensible conservatives) give a toss about are the veteran benefits. I daresay they'd count it a minor victory if social security and medicare goes unpaid.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Collector of souls.
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
It's the only thing they posture about. I doubt they genuinely care though. As long as they can wrap themselves in the flag. The uber right, for a long, long time, were actually blocking a bill a couple of years ago, to provide healthcare to the first responders of 9/11. There has been no greater horse that has been flogged by the right, than that. Yet they weren't interested in helping the people that put their lives on the line. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I love it when a plan comes together.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
|
The $100K is the default amount for a subsidized term life insurance policy (SGLI) that military personnel have the option of buying. First responders would get what they bargained for in their civilian contracts. Victims would get what they purchased privately. Life insurance policies without war exclusions have been available for as long as I can remember and I've known military personnel who went the commercial route because they didn't trust the government to come through on the policy it offered.
The problem arises when the government subsidizes higher death benefits to some segments of the population than others such as the families of civilian victims receiving substantially more than the families of military service members. Politics then makes for second class citizens. OTOH, I don't have any problem with the government subsidizing the death benefits and health care costs of first responders and civilian casualties, in such paramilitary situations, and bringing their incident connected death and injury benefits up to what military personnel get. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
European markets open in 8 hours. What's going to happen to US ratings then? There was a lot of pressure to resolve this clusterfuck before markets opened this week because this was the last weekend before the default. It's not looking like they are going to resolve this in the next 8 hours. I shouldn't be surprised, but I am disappointed. I thought they might do their jobs this weekend.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Wackos are why money can be made. Markets will fall big time. If you saw wacko extremists as I have, then you were collecting cash. That may be an ideal buying opportunity.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
Some local chick wrote in a local paper last week about how she was reporting on something and Boehner was so nice to her (this i believe, he can be personable in real life) and she took the opportunity to tell him (he is our district's congressman) how hard it is to raise her beh-bey on a reporter's salary therefore she didn't want obamacare and he LISTENED to her and she felt democracy in action. Stupid twit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
You don't need to concerned if you will not be affected by
default of the U.S. Treasury on this coming Thursday. If you might be affected, you should hope/pray that Eric Cantor retains his health, and is not delayed in traffic or otherwise fails to attend all coming sessions of the House of Representative. He is the only member allowed by a current House Rule to bring a Bill" related to the debt ceiling" to the Floor for a vote. The Hill Mike Lillis 10/14/13 Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
Keep it shut down (shut down MORE of it, and let it stay down).
And: YAY FOR DEFAULT! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
TNMPM
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
The Taliban says women are not allowed to learn go to school
The Pope says women are not allowed to be priests The John Boehner says women are not allowed to negotiate the government shutdown. The Telegraph Alex Spillius 15 Oct 2013 Women US senators lead compromise efforts on shutdown Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
When Gingrich, et al were playing this game, they were not driven by a political agenda that said, "We want America to fail." This is the first one that concerns me. Because it is driven by people with near zero intelligence levels and a philosophy that says, "We will ignore facts to just know a default will not be harmful."
Gingriich and his "Contract with America" supporters understood how things really work. Therefore backed down in humiliation in order to not make America fail. View henry quirk's post to see how dangerous today's wacko extremists have become. A government default is to me an ideal buying opportunity. It should be profitable. However, it will mean all American debts (current and future) will automatically increase. Nobody with intelligence would advocate that. And that is the problem. These wackos have no idea that they want American to become a second class nation. Intelligence in American politics has dropped to Joseph McCarthy and Nixon plumbers levels. A default will happen if moderates in the Republican party do not stand up and attack the wackos. Even Boehmer no longer displays any backbone. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
This is the NY Times News today...Oct 15, 2013
Probably not many of you remember the Friday night when the US went to bed expecting a nuclear war the next day - the Cuban Missile Crisis. But it's not since then that I have gone to bed with such feelings. Who knows what will happen today ... maybe not nuclear war, but one way or the other, it will certainly be a high-magnitude event. What bothers me in my own mind is that I have actually come to believe the GOP is no longer controlled or made up of men-of-good-will. It's no longer "politics" or a "game". When the entire House of Representatives is jerked about by the $ of two men, the Koch brothers... When elected officials are manipulated into fear of not being re-elected... When the good of the country is no longer the issue... I have lost all sense of humor with the Republicans. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
After a round of golf, Boehner said to Obama that he thought they could work out a grand deal. So the two men sat down multiple times in secret to work out the government budget. Then Cantor discovered the talks through VP Biden. And put threats to Boehner's back. Either back out of the deal or be overthrown in a coup. The threats worked.
Now new threats from these tea party extremists have further saddled Boehner with another dilemma. From the Economist, "how to satisfy their members Quixotic longing to kill Obamacare without shutting down the government or causing a default." Well this forces a question that can no longer be avoided. Is Boehner that incompetent as Speaker of the House as to not properly exercise the power he has. Or has the party so radically changed that no Speaker could rally, muster, and corral his members? The Washington Post is asking that question today in "Boehner sees his control of House Republicans slip away" on 15 October 2013. Quote:
It goes right back to a question of whether Boehner is an incompetent speaker. Or did the Supreme Court make corruption of Congress now easy by creating unrestricted financing of campaign funding by even calling corporations people? Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
It's hard to follow all this. I don't want to invest the time.
Didn't the Republicans change the rules so Cantor is the only one who can bring a bill? They know that the majority of the House has gone on record that they would support the Senate bill to fund the government and debt, and so to keep moderate Republicans from submitting that bill, they changed the rules so that only Cantor can do it. They want him to be in charge. I honestly don't know what power Boehner has left. What is his power? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|