February 1, 2007: Woman births massive baby

Jaydaan · 02-01-2007, 02:29 PM

No mention if the lady was diabetic..... Even gestational diabetes can account for larger babies. It also does not say of she has this baby (or the other one naturally or C-section)

Also the "normal" weight baby looks quite tiny, most likely a 4.5 - 6 pounder. Might even be premie because of the feeding tube, and the oxygen saturation monitor on his/her ankle. I think this was on purpose to show how large the other one is. You know more shock value

Either way, he is a big baby, here is hoping he is healthy and does not end up being obese as a child or adult.

02-01-2007, 02:29 PM	#11
Jaydaan Knight of the Oval-Shaped Conference Table Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Vernon, BC, Canada Posts: 378	No mention if the lady was diabetic..... Even gestational diabetes can account for larger babies. It also does not say of she has this baby (or the other one naturally or C-section) Also the "normal" weight baby looks quite tiny, most likely a 4.5 - 6 pounder. Might even be premie because of the feeding tube, and the oxygen saturation monitor on his/her ankle. I think this was on purpose to show how large the other one is. You know more shock value Either way, he is a big baby, here is hoping he is healthy and does not end up being obese as a child or adult.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)