|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-12-2010, 07:10 PM | #1 |
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
|
Race to the Top Education
Testing the Chinese way. Article from The New York Times.
We were living in China, where their school blended a mostly Western elementary school curriculum with the emphasis on discipline and testing that typifies Asian educational styles. In Asia, such a march of tests for young children was regarded as normal, and not evil or particularly anxiety provoking. That made for some interesting culture clashes. I remember nearly constant tension between the Asian parents, who wanted still more tests and homework, and the Western parents, who were more concerned with whether their kids were having fun — and wanted less. But recently, American education’s “no test” philosophy for young children has been coming under assault, as government programs strongly promote the practice. First there was No Child Left Behind, which took effect in 2003 and required states to give all students standardized tests to measure school progress. Now, President Obama’s Race to the Top educational competition — which announced billions of dollars in state grants this month — includes and encourages more reliance on what educators call “formative tests” or “formative assessments.” These are not the big once-a-year or once-in-a-lifetime exams, like the SATs, but a stream of smaller, less monumental tests, designed in theory, at least, primarily to help students and their teachers know how they’re doing. Some education experts hail the change as a step forward from the ideological dark ages. “Research has long shown that more frequent testing is beneficial to kids, but educators have resisted this finding,” said Gregory J. Cizek, a professor of educational measurement and evaluation at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill But Professor Cizek, who started his career as a second-grade teacher, said the prevailing philosophy of offering young children unconditional praise and support was probably not the best prescription for successful education. “What’s best for kids is frequent testing, where even if they do badly, they can get help and improve and have the satisfaction of doing better,” he said. “Kids don’t get self-esteem by people just telling them they are wonderful.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/we...l?pagewanted=1 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|