The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2007, 10:10 PM   #1
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Black people 'less intelligent' scientist claims

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2677098.ece
Black people 'less intelligent' scientist claims
Quote:
One of the world’s most respected scientists is embroiled in an extraordinary row after claiming that black people are less intelligent than white people.
James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in discovering the structure of DNA, has provoked outrage with his comments, made ahead of his arrival in Britain today.
Quote:
The 79-year-old geneticist said he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really.". He said he hoped that everyone was equal, but countered that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.
A very sad day for me. Watson was a real hero of mine.
Not only the bigotry, the fact that I don't believe in race, but the shoddy science is really the worst of it for me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:15 PM   #2
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
The idea that we all deserve equal treatment and opportunity under the law does not equate to an imaginary scientific conclusion that all human beings are, literally, biologically equal. Don't fall prey to Political Correctness. If you define groups of people based on genetic differences, then they are going to gave genetic differences, because you have defined them based on genetic differences. So they will have them. This is no surprise.

Political Correctness kills Free Speech. If we allow it to interfere with Science, we're all doomed. "Feeling Good" does not make facts.
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio

Last edited by Flint; 10-17-2007 at 10:22 PM.
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:35 PM   #3
lumberjim
I can hear my ears
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
meaningless. as a race, asians are probably smarter than europeans. africans are probably more nimble and athletic than both. individuals vary, obviously. i mean...look at freshness. he's one dumb asian. i'm glad the old guy had the balls to speak his mind. jimmy the greek got fucked.
__________________
This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality
Embrace this moment, remember
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan
lumberjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:46 PM   #4
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree, PC is mostly BS and harms most things including science, however:
He did not present any data, it is not his field and there is only one race, the human race.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:50 PM   #5
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
He didn't present any data, or there wasn't any data presented in the article?

Or, the third option, that no data is necessary to support this statement (the product of logical thinking):
Quote:
“there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.
It isn't what we're supposed to say, but, what about it is wrong? What is logically wrong with what he said?
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:55 PM   #6
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
What is logically wrong with what he said?
It's a fluffy assumption... no data. Intelligence cannot be quantified that way.
Again, not his field.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:58 PM   #7
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
How is it fluffy? What data does it require? Why is genetics "not his field" if he is a geneticist?
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 11:14 PM   #8
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint
It isn't what we're supposed to say, but, what about it is wrong? What is logically wrong with what he said?
This part:

Quote:
He said he hoped that everyone was equal, but countered that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.
That's where he suddenly switches from talking about segregated, African genetic groups to any and all Western, homogenized-by-countless-generations black people.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 11:44 PM   #9
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Genetics is his field, not testing intelligence.
I have yet to see any data that states that he did any exhaustive studies in that area at all, in fact, or that he has any background in that field.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 12:09 AM   #10
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
There was no genetic evidence shown and his "reasons" could easily be refuted by a sociologist. Education will play a much bigger role in intelligence than genetics when it comes to large groups.

Quote:
Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said today: “It is sad to see a scientist of such achievement making such baseless, unscientific and extremely offensive comments.

“I am sure the scientific community will roundly reject what appear to be Dr Watson’s personal prejudices. These comments serve as a reminder of the attitudes which can still exist at the highest professional levels.”
If the entire scientific community denies his claims, I would take this as more personal reasoning than anything since he has shown to be prejudice against gays in the past.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 12:39 AM   #11
queequeger
Hypercharismatic Telepathical Knight
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The armpit of the Universe... Augusta, GA
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Education will play a much bigger role in intelligence than genetics when it comes to large groups.
True.

I thought we did this bell curve thing decades ago. This fella has let his profession dictate his logic, trying to find the genetic reason for something that is clearly environmental. While he does make a point that geographic separation could play a part, the only separation that's shown to make a difference in intelligence is education/social class. Likewise, physical strength will be different in a working class versus ruling class, all things equal. It's like a mathematician trying to find equations for emotions, some things can not be covered in your chosen expertise.
__________________
Hoocha, hoocha, hoocha... lobster.
queequeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 03:09 AM   #12
freshnesschronic
Professor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,555
sidenote: if you don't want to see a refute of an irrelevant and unnecessary comment that fatass made then don't read, but fatass had to stir up shit with me for no apparent reason AGAIN


I'm only "dumb" because you don't understand me nor feel the need to try to.
I've never been cocky here in this forum about my intelligence but I believe I am 10x smarter than fatass ever will be. So he has more experience in life obviously, but coming from the community that I was raised in, the grades I had, the GPA I earned, the honors societies I belonged to, I can safely say I am almost guaranteeing I have more brains. Naperville, one of the most affluent cities in the state of Illinois. Our school district is chronically in the top five of the whole nation for years in nationally averages, fun fact: it was #1 in the world in Math and Science for grade schoolers; ahead of China. Oh, so it doesn't reflect on me huh? You'd be dumb to think it wouldn't, even if indirectly.

Last edited by freshnesschronic; 10-18-2007 at 03:21 AM.
freshnesschronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 03:50 AM   #13
Ibby
erika
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
YOO THNK IM STOOPID CUZ U DONT UNNERSAND ME WAAAAAH

oh, and IM NT COKY BUT IM SMRTR THN CHINA LOL
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
Ibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 07:50 AM   #14
Kitsune
still eats dirt
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
There was no genetic evidence shown
He wouldn't be able to do it. There is more genetic variation within a race than there are between them.
Kitsune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 07:55 AM   #15
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Yup, which is why the idea of different "races" has very little evidence to back it up. The percentage isn't even close to 50% as well, I think it is around 85 and 15.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.