Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormieweather
So the people arguing for Alec here feel that what he said is justifiable, acceptable, is not abusive, and he should suffer no consequences for his behavior, is that correct?
|
No
Quote:
Is this a result of the common, yet erroneous, opinion that abuse is only physical?
|
No
Quote:
That verbal assult does not count?
|
No
Quote:
How about the people who say that slapping with an open hand is not hitting? Or forcing your wife to have sex is not rape because she is your property? You all agree?
|
You're off on a tangent too far from this case to be considered. That's the subject for another thread.
Quote:
And further, that his anger is not his responsibility, but his daughter's or even his daughter's mother's fault?
|
Who said that?
Quote:
See, I believe in self-accountabililty. We are each responsible for our actions as well as our reactions to external forces. We all have a choice in what we do and say. Alec could have chosen a non-abusive, assertive manner to discuss his disappointment and hurt with his daughter. Even if he 'lost' it and said things he shouldn't have, he could have been mature and emotionally healthy enough to apologise (without slinging blame and excuses around). But he didn't.
|
I see, so even though it's none of your business, you still want to invoke the death penalty, because this innocent child was irreparably harmed by her father yelling at her, and using dirty words she'd never been exposed to, which will permanently ruin her self esteem and cause her to become a Coke and booze addicted Hollywood slut.