Pay for Work Completed

smoothmoniker · 07-28-2004, 01:27 PM

it's an issue of perponderance of the evidence. If you have e-contracts, that's one step above verbal "he said/she said". If he has inked contracts that contradict you, that's one step higher on the evidence latter.

e-contracts aren't inadmissible, they're just weak against stronger arguments. In small claims courts, they don't necessarily expect a 200 page notarized legal document ... they get alot of cases where it's just some guys printed invoice, or scribbling on a napkin.

-sm

07-28-2004, 01:27 PM	#1
smoothmoniker to live and die in LA Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,090	it's an issue of perponderance of the evidence. If you have e-contracts, that's one step above verbal "he said/she said". If he has inked contracts that contradict you, that's one step higher on the evidence latter. e-contracts aren't inadmissible, they're just weak against stronger arguments. In small claims courts, they don't necessarily expect a 200 page notarized legal document ... they get alot of cases where it's just some guys printed invoice, or scribbling on a napkin. -sm __________________ to live and die in LA

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)