The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2010, 10:08 PM   #1
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
The truth however sheds a different light on Clinton and the chances he had as president to get Bin Laden.
bin Laden attacks America in NYC, Washington DC, and embassies in Africa. So what do the wackos do? Disband Alec Station - the group that has only one purpose - to get bin Laden. So who does Classicman blame? Clinton.

Extremists will never ask this question. "When are we going after bin Laden?" Extremists conveniently forget that when bin Laden was public enemy #1, George Jr simply eliminated the organization tasked to get him. Then blame Clinton?

Extremists subverted and halted efforts after effort to get bin Laden. When bin Laden was identified in Tora Bora, the entire 10th Mountain Division was nearby ready to go. Thanks to extremists, the 10th Mountain never moved. Was never permitted to get bin Laden. Eventually bin Laden escaped using the same trail that Special Forces wanted to use to get him. But again, same wackos also would not let Special Forces go in. Protecting bin Laden means extremistins always had a boogey man - besides Rush Limbaugh.

Classicman routinely forgets that reality. Otherwise he would have to admit extremist are that slimmy, that dumb and that anti-American.

The only reason Alec Station was disbanded - extremists are that wacko anti-American. A political agenda is always more important.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2010, 10:09 PM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
Do you have a cite for this that isn't one of your own posts.
I saw it live on Peter Jennings. Jennings did something unusual that night - a live interview with a White House spokesman. Jennings challenged the White House spokesman (I don't remember his name) with Richard Clarke's testimony. Clarke said the President encountered him in the hallway on the 12 Sept. Making a comment that Saddam did this. Clark said no sir. bin Laden did this. The president then said to see if Saddam did it.

That spokesman denied what Jennings reported. Then Jennings said ABC News also had testimony from a military officer who was standing next to Clark and who confirmed the entire conversation. The White House spokesman then went silent - would not say any more.

Quote:
Later on the evening of the 12th, ... wandering alone around the Situation Room, was the President. ... He grabbed a few of us and closed the door to the conference room. "Look", he told us, "I know you have a lot to do and all ... but I want you , as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this. See if he's linked in any way ...."

I was once again taken aback, incredulous, and it showed. "But, Mr President, al Qaeda did this."

"I know, I know, but ... see if Saddam was involved. Just look. I want to know any shred ..."

"Absolutely, we will look ... again." I was trying to be more respectful, more responsive. "But you know, we have looked several times for state sponsorship of al Qaeda and not found any real linkages to Iraq. Iran plays a little, as does Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, Yemen."

"Look into Iraq, Saddam," the President said testily and left us. Lisa Gordon-Hagerty stared after him with her mouth hanging open.

Paul Kurtz walked in, passing the President on the way out. Seeing our expressions, he asked, "Geez, what just happened here?"

"Wolfowitz got to him," Lisa said, shaking her head.
From where we all sit today, that story is not new. It is what we expect from them who also loved torture, intentional lying about Saddam's WMDs, and ... well their overt lies would more than double this post.

Of course they wanted 11 September blamed on Saddam. History is quite clear about that - and why.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 08:57 AM   #3
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
Classicman routinely forgets that reality. Otherwise he would have to admit extremist are that slimmy, that dumb and that anti-American.
I agree that you have again taken this to a personal level. Why is that tommy?

I agree with you on this point though. "extremist are that slimmy, that dumb and that anti-American."
Your problem is that you are just as much an extremist. Wake up and smell the coffee.

And what is this fascination YOU have with Rush Limbaugh, anyway?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.