The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-09-2010, 10:35 PM   #11
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
The truth however sheds a different light on Clinton and the chances he had as president to get Bin Laden.

Link
There are plenty more. To accuse Bush and not Clinton is revisionist and an extremist's attempt at rewriting history. It is nothing short of irresponsible and inaccurate.
In fact, Clinton went after Bin Laden in both Afghanistan and Sudan. He authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him...and they failed. And ultimately could not get approval from the Republican House to do more.

He (through his counter terrorism coordinator) also provided Bush with memos identifying Bin Laden and al Queda as the greatest national security/terrorist threat the day Bush took office..and it was ignored for nine months.

"We urgently need . . . a Principals level review on the al Qida network."
Quote:
The National Security Archive today posted the widely-debated, but previously unavailable, January 25, 2001, memo from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to national security advisor Condoleezza Rice - the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration. The document was central to debates in the 9/11 hearings over the Bush administration's policies and actions on terrorism before September 11, 2001. Clarke's memo requests an immediate meeting of the National Security Council's Principals Committee to discuss broad strategies for combating al-Qaeda by giving counterterrorism aid to the Northern Alliance and Uzbekistan, expanding the counterterrorism budget and responding to the U.S.S. Cole attack. Despite Clarke's request, there was no Principals Committee meeting on al-Qaeda until September 4, 2001.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/...#original_post
How soon we forget that Condi Rice had a major foreign policy/national security addressed scheduled for Sept. 11, 2001. It was to promote "missile defense" as the number one priority for US national security.

Bush/Rice dropped the fucking ball right from the start...and dropped the fucking ball again in 2003 when they virtually abandoned the pursuit of al Queda in Afghanistan for their folly in Iraq.

Last edited by Redux; 02-09-2010 at 11:07 PM.
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.