Judge rules on Arizona immigration law

Happy Monkey · 08-02-2010, 12:17 PM

What are you talking about?

She issued a preliminary injunction, preventing certain aspects of the law from taking effect until the lawsuit takes its course. She didn't issue a final ruling on the law, because the lawsuit hasn't happened yet!

If a law is potentially unconstitutional, it shouldn't go into effect until its constitutionality has been determined. That's the type of situation that preliminary injunctions are for.

08-02-2010, 12:17 PM	#11
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	What are you talking about? She issued a preliminary injunction, preventing certain aspects of the law from taking effect until the lawsuit takes its course. She didn't issue a final ruling on the law, because the lawsuit hasn't happened yet! If a law is potentially unconstitutional, it shouldn't go into effect until its constitutionality has been determined. That's the type of situation that preliminary injunctions are for. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)