Judge rules on Arizona immigration law

dmg1969 · 07-30-2010, 12:23 PM

I think some of the Judge's reasoning make me think she is either a little biased toward illegals or just stupid. Why strike down a part of the law requiring a check of immigration status before being released from jail? Her reasoning? That it would require actually require immigration officials to do their job. WTF kind of thought process is that? I am fairly confident that the ruling will be overturned on appeal. Either way, as others have said, it's going to the Supreme Court.

What drives me absolutely bat-shit crazy is that these illegals are actually protesting that the law is discriminatory when they shouldn't be here in the first place.

And I still question the sanity of anyone who does not think that we have a right to enforce our own borders.

Happy Monkey · 08-02-2010, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969

I think some of the Judge's reasoning make me think she is either a little biased toward illegals or just stupid. Why strike down a part of the law requiring a check of immigration status before being released from jail?

The judge didn't strike down any part of the law; she said that the most controversial parts couldn't take effect until the case had been decided, which seems pretty reasonable to me.

xoxoxoBruce · 08-02-2010, 11:31 AM

Semantics, a law delayed is a law denied.

classicman · 08-02-2010, 01:03 PM

But apparently she did...

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Semantics, a law delayed is a law denied.

Key word being semantics.

07-30-2010, 12:23 PM	#1
dmg1969 I got nothing Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Central PA Posts: 486	I think some of the Judge's reasoning make me think she is either a little biased toward illegals or just stupid. Why strike down a part of the law requiring a check of immigration status before being released from jail? Her reasoning? That it would require actually require immigration officials to do their job. WTF kind of thought process is that? I am fairly confident that the ruling will be overturned on appeal. Either way, as others have said, it's going to the Supreme Court. What drives me absolutely bat-shit crazy is that these illegals are actually protesting that the law is discriminatory when they shouldn't be here in the first place. And I still question the sanity of anyone who does not think that we have a right to enforce our own borders. __________________ Void where prohibited. Your results may vary. Not intended for resale. Do not remove tag. Objects in mirror are closer than they appear.

08-02-2010, 11:31 AM	#3
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	Semantics, a law delayed is a law denied. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)