Wheaton's eBay auction

Ardax · 12-20-2001, 08:06 AM

Eh? Well, I don't necessarily think that it's morally wrong.

Hell, I don't even think that it's very wrong for an actor to cash in on his or her image. I mean, that's part of what they're paid for, isn't it -- image?

I don't see anything wrong at all with him selling an autographed picture, if people want to buy it.

The way it comes off to me: People have been bugging him for fan collectible memorabilia, so he's giving them a chance to have it. I don't think the objective is the money as much as it is doing something for the fans. Maybe I'm looking at things through rose colored glasses, but that's how I see it. I'm sure there's much more lucrative things he could do for money. (Then again, that auction IS at $372...)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-20-2001, 08:06 AM	#2
Ardax Irrelevant Adulterant Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 43	Eh? Well, I don't necessarily think that it's morally wrong. Hell, I don't even think that it's very wrong for an actor to cash in on his or her image. I mean, that's part of what they're paid for, isn't it -- image? I don't see anything wrong at all with him selling an autographed picture, if people want to buy it. The way it comes off to me: People have been bugging him for fan collectible memorabilia, so he's giving them a chance to have it. I don't think the objective is the money as much as it is doing something for the fans. Maybe I'm looking at things through rose colored glasses, but that's how I see it. I'm sure there's much more lucrative things he could do for money. (Then again, that auction IS at $372...)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)