1/27: Ashcroft and the nude

Nic Name · 01-28-2002, 02:40 PM

I think that is the point exactly.

The Pope shouldn't be embarassed about being photographed beside David. It's not pornography.

And Ashcroft should tell those who titter over such photographs to just grow up. Instead, he is embarassed and spends $8,000 to cover 'em up because of the beliefs he holds of the impropriety of these statues in the first place. And that's what's at issue here.

Ashcroft doesn't distinguish between Justice and Playboy bunnies.

01-28-2002, 02:40 PM	#13
Nic Name retired Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,930	I think that is the point exactly. The Pope shouldn't be embarassed about being photographed beside David. It's not pornography. And Ashcroft should tell those who titter over such photographs to just grow up. Instead, he is embarassed and spends $8,000 to cover 'em up because of the beliefs he holds of the impropriety of these statues in the first place. And that's what's at issue here. Ashcroft doesn't distinguish between Justice and Playboy bunnies.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)