Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lookout123
what is your point garnet? that the republicans were asses in the '92 election? agreed. it is important to note that the '92 election pitted a vietnam era candidate against a WWII vet for the first time, so that is why it came to the forefront at the time. it was the last harrah for the WWII vets in the white house (nobody took dole seriously in '96, did they?). but it was ridiculous to worry about what an early 20 something did in the 70's then, as it is now.
|
I just think it's funny how you've got an excuse for the right wing no matter what they do. Very predictable. You call the the Republicans "asses" above and then turn around and give an explanation (excuse?) as to why what their dogging Clinton was acceptable as news fodder. Which is it? I can guarantee you that if the Vietnam records of Bush and Kerry were reversed you wouldn't be making the statement about how actions from 20-30 years ago don't matter.
09-09-2004, 04:19 PM
Threaded Mode